Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19167291›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Molecular dynamics simulations of a DMPC bilayer using nonadditive interaction models.

Joseph E Davis, Obaidur Rahaman, Sandeep Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Closed-loop fluid-fluid immiscibility in binary lipid-sterol membranes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Water in protein hydration and ligand recognition.Journal of molecular recognition : JMR · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph E DavisDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Obaidur Rahaman
Sandeep Patel

Funding

TOWARDS SOLID-STATE NMR STRUCTURES OF GPCRSP20RR015588 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI LENHOFF, ABRAHAM M · 2000 to 2009
$18.2M
UDE COBRE: STRAINED MOLECULES FOR SYNTHESIS OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDSP20RR017716 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BEEBE, THOMAS PAUL · 2002 to 2011
$16.9M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015588NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR015588NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017716NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR017716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a polarizable force field based on the charge-equilibration formalism for molecular dynamics simulations of phospholipid bilayers. We discuss refinement of headgroup dihedral potential parameters to reproduce ab initio conformational energies of dimethylphosphate calculated at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level of theory. We also address the refinement of electrostatic and Lennard-Jones (van der Waals) parameters to reproduce ab initio polarizabilities and water interaction energies of dimethylphosphate and tetramethylammonium. We present results of molecular dynamics simulations of a solvated dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer using this polarizable force field as well as the nonpolarizable, fixed-charge CHARMM27 and CHARMM27r force fields for comparison. Calculated atomic and electron-density profiles, deuterium order parameters, and headgroup orientations are found to be consistent with previous simulations and with experiment. Polarizable interaction models for solvent and lipid exhibit greater water penetration into the lipid interior; this is due to the variation of water molecular dipole moment from a bulk value of 2.6 Debye to a value of 1.9 Debye in the membrane interior. The reduction in the electrostatic component of the desolvation free-energy penalty allows for greater water density. The surface dipole potential predicted by the polarizable model is 0.95 V compared to the value of 0.8 V based on nonpolarizable force-field calculations. Effects of inclusion of explicit polarization are discussed in relation to water dipole moment and varying charge distributions. Dielectric permittivity profiles for polarizable and nonpolarizable interactions exhibit subtle differences arising from the nature of the individual component parameterizations; for the polarizable force field, we obtain a bulk dielectric permittivity of 79, whereas the nonpolarizable force field plateaus at 97 (the value for pure TIP3P water). In the membrane interior, both models predict unit permittivities, with the polarizable models contributing from one to two more units due to the optical dielectric (high-frequency dipole fluctuations). This contribution is a step toward the continuing development of a CHARMM (Chemistry at Harvard Molecular Mechanics) polarizable force field for simulations of biomacromolecular systems.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularAlgorithmsCell Membrane PermeabilityDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersMembrane PotentialsSoftwareStatic ElectricityTorsion, MechanicalDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID19167291
PMCPMC2716476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.