Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19166272›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2009

Biological systems from an engineer's point of view.

Gregory T Reeves, Scott E Fraser

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mathematical modeling of gene expression: a guide for the perplexed biologist.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2011
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Beyond the wiring diagram: signalling through complex neuromodulator networks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory T ReevesBiological Imaging Center, Beckman Institute, Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Scott E Fraser

Funding

Center for in Toto Genomic Analysis of Vertebrate DevelopmentP50HG004071 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FRASER, SCOTT E · 2006 to 2011
$18.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG004071NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBody PatterningFeedback, PhysiologicalOlfactory MucosaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsRegenerationSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID19166272
PMCPMC2628404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.