Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19165316›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2009

Computational modeling of the hematopoietic erythroid-myeloid switch reveals insights into cooperativity, priming, and irreversibility.

Vijay Chickarmane, Tariq Enver, Carsten Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ultrasensitivity and bistability in covalent-modification cycles with positive autoregulation.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Dynamic Modeling of Transcriptional Gene Regulatory Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Causal Gene Regulatory Network Modeling and Genomics: Second-Generation Challenges.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Kinetic models of hematopoietic differentiation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Vijay ChickarmaneDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Tariq Enver
Carsten Peterson
Lund University · SECalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U137973817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell lineage choices are decided by genetic networks that are turned ON/OFF in a switch-like manner. However, prior to lineage commitment, genes are primed at low expression levels. Understanding the underlying molecular circuitry in terms of how it governs both a primed state and, at the other extreme, a committed state is of relevance not only to hematopoiesis but also to developmental systems in general. We develop a computational model for the hematopoietic erythroid-myeloid lineage decision, which is determined by a genetic switch involving the genes PU.1 and GATA-1. Dynamical models based upon known interactions between these master genes, such as mutual antagonism and autoregulation, fail to make the system bistable, a desired feature for robust lineage determination. We therefore suggest a new mechanism involving a cofactor that is regulated as well as recruited by one of the master genes to bind to the antagonistic partner that is necessary for bistability and hence switch-like behavior. An interesting fallout from this architecture is that suppression of the cofactor through external means can lead to a loss of cooperativity, and hence to a primed state for PU.1 and GATA-1. The PU.1-GATA-1 switch also interacts with another mutually antagonistic pair, C/EBPalpha-FOG-1. The latter pair inherits the state of its upstream master genes and further reinforces the decision due to several feedback loops, thereby leading to irreversible commitment. The genetic switch, which handles the erythroid-myeloid lineage decision, is an example of a network that implements both a primed and a committed state by regulating cooperativity through recruitment of cofactors. Perturbing the feedback between the master regulators and downstream targets suggests potential reprogramming strategies. The approach points to a framework for lineage commitment studies in general and could aid the search for lineage-determining genes.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAnimalsCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaCell DifferentiationCell LineageErythroid Precursor CellsFeedback, PhysiologicalGATA1 Transcription FactorGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksHematopoiesisHomeodomain ProteinsHumansNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaGATA1 Transcription FactorHomeodomain ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1Trans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID19165316
PMCPMC2613533
OpenAlexW2093368239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.