Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19165233›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2009

Inhibition of oxygen sensors as a therapeutic strategy for ischaemic and inflammatory disease.

Peter Fraisl, Julián Aragonés, Peter Carmeliet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reactive oxygen species-responsive polymer drug delivery systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Peter FraislVesalius Research Center, VIB, K. U. Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Julián Aragonés
Peter Carmeliet
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells in the human body need oxygen to function and survive, and severe deprivation of oxygen, as occurs in ischaemic heart disease and stroke, is a major cause of mortality. Nevertheless, other organisms, such as the fossorial mole rat or diving seals, have acquired the ability to survive in conditions of limited oxygen supply. Hypoxia tolerance also allows the heart to survive chronic oxygen shortage, and ischaemic preconditioning protects tissues against lethal hypoxia. The recent discovery of a new family of oxygen sensors--including prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing proteins 1-3 (PHD1-3)--has yielded exciting novel insights into how cells sense oxygen and keep oxygen supply and consumption in balance. Advances in understanding of the role of these oxygen sensors in hypoxia tolerance, ischaemic preconditioning and inflammation are creating new opportunities for pharmacological interventions for ischaemic and inflammatory diseases.

Indexed as

Amino Acids, DicarboxylicAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsHumansHypoxiaHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1InflammationIschemiaIschemic PreconditioningMyocardial ContractionOxygen ConsumptionProcollagen-Proline DioxygenaseAmino Acids, DicarboxylicAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1oxalylglycineProcollagen-Proline Dioxygenase

Identifiers

PMID19165233
OpenAlexW1994313430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.