Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19164902›Full record

ArticlePrion

Toxic effects of intracerebral PrP antibody administration during the course of BSE infection in mice.

Maxime Lefebvre-Roque, Elisabeth Kremmer, Sabine Gilch, Wen-Quan Zou, Cécile Féraudet, Chantal Mourton Gilles, Nicole Salès, Jacques Grassi, Pierluigi Gambetti, Thierry Baron and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prion. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Therapeutic Trajectories in Human Prion Diseases.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Vaccines for prion diseases: a realistic goal?Cell and tissue research · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunotherapy against Prion Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. The role of prion strain diversity in the development of successful therapeutic treatments.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The immunobiology of prion diseases.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2013
    Review
  13. Could immunomodulation be used to prevent prion diseases?Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Maxime Lefebvre-RoqueDepartment of Infectology, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA.
Elisabeth Kremmer
Sabine Gilch
Wen-Quan Zou
Cécile Féraudet
Chantal Mourton Gilles
Nicole Salès
Jacques Grassi
Pierluigi Gambetti
Thierry Baron
Hermann Schätzl
Corinne Ida Lasmézas
Scripps Research Institute · USCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRMRC Prion Unit · GBTechnical University of Munich · DEInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The absence of specific immune response is a hallmark of prion diseases. However, in vitro and in vivo experiments have provided evidence that an anti-PrP humoral response could have beneficial effects. Prophylactic passive immunization performed at the time of infection delayed or prevented disease. Nonetheless, the potential therapeutic effect of PrP antibodies administered shortly before the clinical signs has never been tested in vivo. Moreover, a recent study showed the potential toxicity of PrP antibodies administered intracerebrally. We aimed at evaluating the effect of a prolonged intracerebral anti-PrP antibody administration at the time of neuroinvasion in BSE infected Tg20 mice. Unexpectedly, despite a good penetration of the antibodies in the brain parenchyma, the treatment was not protective against the development of BSE. Instead, it led to an extensive neuronal loss, strong astrogliosis and microglial activation. Since this effect was observed after injection of anti-PrP antibodies as whole IgGs, F(ab')(2) or Fab fragments, the toxicity was directly related to the ability of the antibodies to recognize native PrP and to the intracerebral concentration achieved, and not to the Fc portion or the divalence of the antibodies. This experiment shows that a prolonged treatment with anti-PrP antibodies by the intracerebral route can induce severe side-effects and calls for caution with regard to the use of similar approaches for late therapeutic interventions in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntibody FormationBrainCattleEncephalopathy, Bovine SpongiformImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, TransgenicPrionsAntibodiesImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin GPrions

Identifiers

PMID19164902
PMCPMC2634593
OpenAlexW2076245322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.