Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1916054›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia1991

Simple empirical assessment of beta-cell function by a constant infusion of glucose test in normal and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects.

J C Levy, A Rudenski, M Burnett, R Knight, D R Matthews, R C Turner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J C LevyDiabetes Research Laboratories, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
A Rudenski
M Burnett
R Knight
D R Matthews
R C Turner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plasma insulin or C-peptide response to a 90-min constant glucose infusion 5 mg.kg ideal body weight-1.min-1 provides Beta-cell assessment comparable to more intensive methods. In 14 diet-treated Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects and 12 non-diabetic subjects, plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations gave near linear plots against simultaneous glucose values. The 'glucose-insulin and glucose-C-peptide vectors' (G-I and G-C vectors), could be extrapolated to predict insulin and C-peptide levels during a 12 mmol/l hyperglycaemic clamp. Predicted concentrations correlated with clamp concentrations, r = 0.94 and r = 0.98 respectively, p less than 0.001, validating the vectors as empirical glucose dose-response curves. The vector slopes correlated highly with %Beta, a mathematical model-derived measure of Beta-cell function using constant infusion of glucose model assessment, Spearman r = 0.95 and 0.93 for insulin and C-peptide, respectively. G-I vector slopes in 21 diet-treated Type 2 diabetic subjects with fasting glucose (mean + 1 SD) 7.5 +/- 2.3 mmol/l, were lower than in 28 non-diabetic subjects, (geometric mean, 1 SD range, 8.4 pmol/mmol (3.3-21.0) and 25.1 pmol/mmol (14.3-44.1), p less than 0.001, respectively), indicating an impaired Beta-cell response. The G-I vector slopes correlated with obesity in both groups (r = 0.54 p less than 0.02 and 0.72, p less than 0.001 respectively), and, in 15 non-diabetic subjects, correlated inversely with insulin sensitivity as measured by a euglycaemic clamp (r = -0.66, p less than 0.01). Thus, Beta-cell function needs to be interpreted in relation to obesity/insulin resistance and, taking obesity into account, only 4 of 21 diabetic patients had Beta-cell function (G-I vector slope) in the non-diabetic range. The fasting plasma glucose in the diabetic subjects correlated inversely with the obesity-corrected G-I and G-C vector slopes (partial r = -0.57, p less than 0.01 and -0.86, p less than 0.001, respectively). The insulin or C-peptide response to the glucose infusion provides a direct empirical measure of the Beta-cell function, which can be interpreted in relation to obesity or to insulin resistance to assess underlying pancreatic responsiveness.

Indexed as

Glucose Clamp TechniqueBlood GlucoseC-PeptideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FastingHumansInsulinInsulin SecretionIslets of LangerhansKineticsMiddle AgedReference ValuesRegression AnalysisBlood GlucoseC-PeptideInsulin

Identifiers

PMID1916054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.