SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for preventing HIV in high-risk individuals.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reviewing HIV-Related Research in Emerging Economies: The Role of Government Reviewing Agencies.Developing world bioethics · 2016Review
- Article
- Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Cure Research: Lessons Learned from Other HIV Interventions and the Way Forward.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2015Review
- From efficacy to effectiveness: facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2013Article
- Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among female sex workers: a cross-sectional study in China.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2012Article
- Harnessing the prevention benefits of antiretroviral therapy to address HIV and tuberculosis.Current HIV research · 2011Review
- Challenges of a hidden epidemic: HIV prevention among women in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2010Article
- Pre-exposure prophylaxis state of the science: empirical analogies for research and implementation.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2010Review
- Periconception pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV transmission: benefits, risks, and challenges to implementation.AIDS (London, England) · 2010Article
- Chemoprophylaxis of Tropical Infectious Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010Review
- Developing and evaluating comprehensive HIV infection control strategies: issues and challenges.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2010Review
- The K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: genetic barriers, resistance profile and clinical implications.HIV therapy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwenty-five years into the global HIV/AIDS epidemic, infection rates remain alarmingly high, with over 4 million people becoming infected every year. There is a need for HIV prevention strategies that are more effective. Oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in high-risk individuals may be a reliable tool in preventing the transmission of HIV.
objectivesTo evaluate the risk reduction and side effects of antiretroviral chemoprophylaxis in preventing HIV infection in high-risk individuals SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted electronic searches of MEDLINE (1980 through June 2008); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (March 2008); EMBASE (June 2008); and AIDSearch (June 2008). We also searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in June 2008 for ongoing or prospective trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of any antiretroviral agent in preventing HIV infection in high-risk individuals DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data concerning outcomes, details of the interventions, and other study characteristics were extracted by two independent authors using a standardized data extraction form. The information gathered from each included trial were location of the trial, date, publication status, demographics of participants (e.g. age, gender, risk behaviour), exposure modality, type of antiretroviral drug used, duration of drug use, and outcomes. Relative risk with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the measure of effect. Only one trial met our inclusion criteria, so we did not perform a meta-analysis. MAIN
resultsOne randomised controlled trial met the criteria for the review, although it was not completed as planned. The trial did not have the statistical power to answer questions about the efficacy of antiretroviral PrEP for HIV prevention in the assessed risk group. AUTHORS'
conclusionsPresently there is no reliable evidence to support the use of any antiretroviral agent for HIV chemoprophylaxis.The value of chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention cannot be assessed on the basis of the included trial. The result was not statistically significant and, moreover, the trial was not completed as planned; therefore, the use of antiretroviral agents for HIV chemoprophylaxis cannot be recommended at present. To assess the value of antiretroviral agents for HIV chemoprophylaxis, we advocate well-conducted trials with the statistical power to answer questions about PrEP efficacy and safety in various populations and risk groups. These trials also should evaluate other important issues of concern, such as drug safety, adherence, drug resistance, and the effect of PrEP on risk behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.