Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19160265›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals.

Marie-Pierre Gagnon, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Pierre Frémont, Pierre Pluye, Johanne Gagnon, Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Marie Desmartis, Lucile Turcot and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluation of Telemedicine in Japan.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marie-Pierre GagnonFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, 10, rue de l'Espinay, D6-726, Québec, Québec, Canada, G1L 3L5. Marie-Pierre.Gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca
France Légaré
Michel Labrecque
Pierre Frémont
Pierre Pluye
Johanne Gagnon
Josip Car
Claudia Pagliari
Marie Desmartis
Lucile Turcot
Karine Gravel

Funding

CIHR 79141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation and communication technologies (ICT) are defined as digital and analogue technologies that facilitate the capturing, processing, storage and exchange of information via electronic communication. ICTs have the potential to improve information management, access to health services, quality of care, continuity of services, and cost containment. Knowledge is lacking on conditions for successful ICT integration into practice.

objectivesTo carry out a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to promote the adoption of ICT by healthcare professionals. SEARCH STRATEGY: Specific strategies, defined with the help of an information specialist, were used to search the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) register and additional relevant databases. We considered studies published from January 1990 until October 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), controlled before/after studies (CBAs), and interrupted time series (ITS) that reported objectively measured outcomes concerning the effect of interventions to promote adoption of ICT in healthcare professionals' practices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed each potentially relevant study for inclusion. We resolved discrepancies by discussion or a third reviewer. Two teams of two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. A meta-analysis of study outcomes was not possible, given the small number of included studies and the heterogeneity of intervention and outcomes measures. We conducted qualitative analyses, and have presented the results in a narrative format. MAIN

resultsTen studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine of them were RCTs. All studies involved physicians as participants (including postgraduate trainees), and one study also included other participants. Only two studies measured patient outcomes. Searching skills and/or frequency of use of electronic databases, mainly MEDLINE, were targeted in eight studies. Use of Internet for audit and feedback, and email for provider-patient communication, were targeted in two studies. Four studies showed small to moderate positive effects of the intervention on ICT adoption. Four studies were unable to demonstrate significant positive effects, and the two others showed mixed effects. No studies looked at the long-term effect or sustainability of the intervention. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is very limited evidence on effective interventions promoting the adoption of ICTs by healthcare professionals. Small effects have been reported for interventions targeting the use of electronic databases and digital libraries. The effectiveness of interventions to promote ICT adoption in healthcare settings remains uncertain, and more well designed trials are needed.

Indexed as

Databases, BibliographicHealth PersonnelInformation Storage and RetrievalProfessional PracticeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID19160265
PMCPMC3973635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.