ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2010
Primary mesh augmentation with fibrin glue for abdominal wall closure--investigations on a biomechanical model.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2014Pooled it
- Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Pooled it
- Permanent end-colostomy parastomal hernia prevention using a novel three-dimensional mesh.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Observational
- To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019Article
- Biomechanical properties of (semi-) synthetic glues for mesh fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe occurrence of incisional hernias after various types of abdominal procedures and incisions continues to be a problem. A number of studies conducted for diverse risk groups have identified a beneficial role for the prophylactic use of mesh augmentation. To what extent this affects the stability of a suture was tested in our biomechanical model. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo that effect, we compared three groups, carrying out six measurements in each case: (1) single suture in a muscle specimen, (2) suture and additional reinforcement with fibrin glue, and (3) suture and additional reinforcement with a mesh fixed with fibrin glue (Tissucol, Tisseel; with an overlap of 2 cm to all sides).
resultsThe single suture conferred a tensile strength, which in our model, was just above the prescribed maximum abdominal pressure of 32 N (37.3 N). The additional use of fibrin glue did not have any significant impact on this result (41.8 N). Only through mesh augmentation with fibrin glue was it possible to achieve a significantly greater tensile strength (64.5 N, p = 0.003).
conclusionsThe prophylactic use of meshes for stabilization of laparotomy closures appears to be effective. Adequate mesh fixation can be achieved with fibrin glue alone. Further experimental studies and in particular randomized clinical trials are needed to demonstrate proof of the long-term advantages of mesh augmentation in risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.