Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19158407›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2009

T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice.

Yada Treesukosol, Ginger D Blonde, Alan C Spector

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Noncanonical Taste Transduction of Sugars Elicits Responses in a Dedicated Subset of Gustatory Afferent Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanisms and Functions of Sweet Reception in Oral and Extraoral Organs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Novel Mechanism for T1R-Independent Taste Responses to Concentrated Sugars.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sugar causes obesity and metabolic syndrome in mice independently of sweet taste.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yada TreesukosolDept. of Psychology, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee FL 32306-4301, USA. spector@psy.fsu.edu
Ginger D Blonde
Alan C Spector
Florida State University · US

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF TASTE FUNCTIONR01DC004574 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SPECTOR, ALAN C · 2001 to 2019
$4.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004574NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC004574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are expressed in taste receptor cells and form a heterodimer binding with compounds described as sweet by humans. We examined whether Polycose taste might be mediated through this heterodimer by testing T1R2 knockout (KO) and T1R3 KO mice and their wild-type (WT) littermate controls in a series of brief-access taste tests (25-min sessions with 5-s trials). Sucrose, Na-saccharin, and Polycose were each tested for three consecutive sessions with order of presentation varied among subgroups in a Latin-Square manner. Both KO groups displayed blunted licking responses and initiated significantly fewer trials of sucrose and Na-saccharin across a range of concentrations. KO mice tested after Polycose exposure demonstrated some degree of concentration-dependent licking of sucrose, likely attributable to learning related to prior postingestive experience. These results are consistent with prior findings in the literature, implicating the T1R2+3 heterodimer as the principal taste receptor for sweet-tasting ligands, and also provide support for the potential of postingestive experience to influence responding in the KO mice. In contrast, T1R2 KO and T1R3 KO mice displayed concentration-dependent licking responses to Polycose that tracked those of their WT controls and in some cases licked midrange concentrations more; the number of Polycose trials initiated overall did not differ between KO and WT mice. Thus, the T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are individually unnecessary for normal concentration-dependent licking of Polycose to be expressed in a brief-access test. Whether at least one of these T1R protein subunits is necessary for normal Polycose responsiveness remains untested. Alternatively, there may be a novel taste receptor(s) that mediates polysaccharide taste.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorTasteAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFood PreferencesGlucansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutProtein MultimerizationProtein SubunitsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSaccharinSex FactorsGlucansProtein SubunitsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSaccharinSucroseSweetening Agentstaste receptors, type 1

Identifiers

PMID19158407
PMCPMC2698609
OpenAlexW2166037462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.