Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19158183›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2009

FGF ligands in Drosophila have distinct activities required to support cell migration and differentiation.

Snehalata Kadam, Amy McMahon, Phoebe Tzou, Angelike Stathopoulos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Collective Migrations ofGenetics · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Snehalata KadamCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology MC114-96, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Amy McMahon
Phoebe Tzou
Angelike Stathopoulos
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR SIGNALING IN DROSOPHILAR01GM078542 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STATHOPOULOS, ANGELIKE · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling controls a vast array of biological processes including cell differentiation and migration, wound healing and malignancy. In vertebrates, FGF signaling is complex, with over 100 predicted FGF ligand-receptor combinations. Drosophila melanogaster presents a simpler model system in which to study FGF signaling, with only three ligands and two FGF receptors (FGFRs) identified. Here we analyze the specificity of FGFR [Heartless (Htl) and Breathless (Btl)] activation by each of the FGF ligands [Pyramus (Pyr), Thisbe (Ths) and Branchless (Bnl)] in Drosophila. We confirm that both Pyr and Ths can activate Htl, and that only Bnl can activate Btl. To examine the role of each ligand in supporting activation of the Htl FGFR, we utilize genetic approaches that focus on the earliest stages of embryonic development. When pyr and ths are equivalently expressed using the Gal4 system, these ligands support qualitatively different FGFR signaling responses. Both Pyr and Ths function in a non-autonomous fashion to support mesoderm spreading during gastrulation, but Pyr exhibits a longer functional range. pyr and ths single mutants exhibit defects in mesoderm spreading during gastrulation, yet only pyr mutants exhibit severe defects in dorsal mesoderm specification. We demonstrate that the Drosophila FGFs have different activities and that cell migration and differentiation have different ligand requirements. Furthermore, these FGF ligands are not regulated solely by differential expression, but the sequences of these linked genes have evolved to serve different functions. We contend that inherent properties of FGF ligands make them suitable to support specific FGF-dependent processes, and that FGF ligands are not always interchangeable.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFibroblast Growth FactorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, InsectLigandsMesodermModels, BiologicalMutationProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorSignal Transductionbnl protein, DrosophilaBTL protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFibroblast Growth Factorshtl protein, DrosophilaLigandsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID19158183
PMCPMC2685942
OpenAlexW2133274338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.