Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19157957›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2009

Next is now: new technologies for sequencing of genomes, transcriptomes, and beyond.

Ryan Lister, Brian D Gregory, Joseph R Ecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrating physiological and multi-omics methods to elucidate heat stress tolerance for sustainable rice production.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan ListerPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Brian D Gregory
Joseph R Ecker

Funding

The San Diego Epigenome CenterU01ES017166 · NIEHS · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2008 to 2013
$16.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES017166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sudden availability of DNA sequencing technologies that rapidly produce vast amounts of sequence information has triggered a paradigm shift in genomics, enabling massively parallel surveying of complex nucleic acid populations. The diversity of applications to which these technologies have already been applied demonstrates the immense range of cellular processes and properties that can now be studied at the single-base resolution. These include genome resequencing and polymorphism discovery, mutation mapping, DNA methylation, histone modifications, transcriptome sequencing, gene discovery, alternative splicing identification, small RNA profiling, DNA-protein, and possibly even protein-protein interactions. Thus, these deep sequencing technologies offer plant biologists unprecedented opportunities to increase the understanding of the functions and dynamics of plant cells and populations.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression ProfilingGenome, PlantPolymorphism, GeneticRNA, PlantSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID19157957
PMCPMC2723731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.