Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19156894›Full record

Trial reportCancer2009

Infections and association with different intensity of chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia.

Lillian Sung, Alan Gamis, Todd A Alonzo, Allen Buxton, Kristen Britton, Joetta Deswarte-Wallace, William G Woods

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Case reports in infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lillian SungDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Lillian.sung@sickkids.ca
Alan Gamis
Todd A Alonzo
Allen Buxton
Kristen Britton
Joetta Deswarte-Wallace
William G Woods
Aflac (United States) · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USChildren's Oncology Group · USHospital for Sick Children · CAMiller Children's & Women's Hospital · USSinai Hospital · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
Community Clinical Oncology Program Research BaseU10CA095861 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI POLLOCK, BRAD H · 2002 to 2013
$19.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA095861NCI NIH HHS U10 CA095861-08NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objectives were to compare infections during different intensities of therapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

methodsSubjects were children enrolled in Children's Cancer Group 2891 with AML. In phase 1 (induction), patients were randomized to intensive or standard timing. In phase 2 (consolidation), those with a family donor were allocated allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT); the remainder were randomized to autologous SCT or chemotherapy. This report compares infections between different treatments on an intent-to-treat basis.

resultsDuring phase 1, intensive timing was associated with more bacterial (57.7% vs 39.4%; P < .001), fungal (27.4% vs 9.9%; P < .001), and viral (14.0% vs 3.9%; P < .001) infections compared with standard timing. During phase 2, chemotherapy was associated with more bacterial (56.5% vs 40.1%; P = .005), but similar fungal (9.5% vs 6.1%; P = 1.000) and viral (4.2% vs 12.9%; P = .728) infections compared with allogeneic SCT. No differences between chemotherapy and autologous SCT infections were seen. Fatal infections were more common during intensive compared with standard timing induction (5.5% vs 0.9%; P = .004). Infectious deaths were similar between chemotherapy, autologous SCT, and allogeneic SCT.

conclusionsPrevalence of infection varies depending on the intensity and type of treatment. This information sheds insight into the mechanisms behind susceptibility and outcome of infections in pediatric AML.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBacterial InfectionsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfectionsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMycosesStem Cell TransplantationVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID19156894
PMCPMC2677372
OpenAlexW2014330546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.