Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19156469›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2009

Resident self-assessment and self-reflection: University of Wisconsin-Madison's Five-Year Study.

Christopher Hildebrand, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Mary A Roach, Anne Gravel Sullivan, Aimee Teo Broman, Bennett Vogelman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Verification of accurate technical insight: a prerequisite for self-directed surgical training.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher HildebrandWilliam S. Middleton Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
Elizabeth Trowbridge
Mary A Roach
Anne Gravel Sullivan
Aimee Teo Broman
Bennett Vogelman
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChart review represents a critical cornerstone for practice-based learning and improvement in our internal medicine residency program.

objectiveTo document residents' performance monitoring and improvement skills in their continuity clinics, their satisfaction with practice-based learning and improvement, and their ability to self-reflect on their performance.

designRetrospective longitudinal design with repeated measures.

participantsEighty Internal Medicine residents abstracted data for 3 consecutive years from the medical records of their 4,390 patients in the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW) Hospital and Clinics and William S. Middleton Veterans Administration (VA) outpatient clinics. MEASUREMENT: Logistic modeling was used to determine the effect of postgraduate year, resident sex, graduation cohort, and clinic setting on residents' "compliance rate" on 17 nationally recognized health screening and chronic disease management parameters from 2003 to 2007.

resultsResidents' adherence to national preventive and chronic disease standards increased significantly from intern to subsequent years for administering immunizations, screening for diabetes, cholesterol, cancer, and behavioral risks, and for management of diabetes. Of the residents, 92% found the chart review exercise beneficial, with 63% reporting gains in understanding about their medical practices, 26% reflecting on specific gaps in their practices, and 8% taking critical action to improve their patient outcomes.

conclusionsThis paper provides support for the feasibility and practicality of this limited-cost method of chart review. It also directs our residency program's attention in the continuity clinic to a key area important to internal medicine training programs by highlighting the potential benefit of enhancing residents' self-reflection skills.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceGuideline AdherenceInternship and ResidencyMedical AuditSelf-AssessmentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleOutpatient Clinics, HospitalProblem-Based LearningRetrospective StudiesSchools, MedicalWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID19156469
PMCPMC2642556
OpenAlexW2083585776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.