Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19156390›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2009

[Opioid-induced immunosuppression. A clinically relevant problem?].

H L Rittner, A Brack

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H L RittnerKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Zentrum Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
A Brack
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several in vitro and animal studies have demonstrated the immunosuppressive effects of opioids and an increased risk of infection. The clinical relevance of these findings is unclear. In this review the relevant animal and human studies on the relationship of opioid use and risk of infection are summarized. The areas of retroviral infections (i.e. human immunodeficiency virus, HIV), sepsis and pneumonia, postoperative and chronic pain therapy are covered. In the majority of animal studies an increased risk of infection was demonstrated but in human studies these findings were contradictory. However, these studies were frequently underpowered because they involved small patient collectives and do not reflect the standards of evidence-based medicine. In summary, a causal relationship between opioid therapy and an increased risk of infection could neither be conclusively demonstrated nor fully excluded.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsChronic DiseaseHumansImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmunosuppression TherapyInfectionsPainRiskAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID19156390
OpenAlexW3191924116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.