Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19156208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Are Hox genes ancestrally involved in axial patterning? Evidence from the hydrozoan Clytia hemisphaerica (Cnidaria).

Roxane Chiori, Muriel Jager, Elsa Denker, Patrick Wincker, Corinne Da Silva, Hervé Le Guyader, Michaël Manuel, Eric Quéinnec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ParaHox Genes Revisited: From Gut Patterning to Integrated Axial and Neural Organization in Rotifera.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Aboral cell types ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
  5. The genome of the colonial hydroidGenome research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The genome of the deep-sea anemoneProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Seeking Sense in the Hox Gene Cluster.Journal of developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sponges Lack ParaHox Genes.Genome biology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mouth development.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Roxane ChioriUPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7138 CNRS UPMC MNHN IRD, Paris, France.
Muriel Jager
Elsa Denker
Patrick Wincker
Corinne Da Silva
Hervé Le Guyader
Michaël Manuel
Eric Quéinnec
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGenoscope · FRSorbonne Université · FRNorwegian Institute of Marine Research · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early evolution and diversification of Hox-related genes in eumetazoans has been the subject of conflicting hypotheses concerning the evolutionary conservation of their role in axial patterning and the pre-bilaterian origin of the Hox and ParaHox clusters. The diversification of Hox/ParaHox genes clearly predates the origin of bilaterians. However, the existence of a "Hox code" predating the cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor and supporting the deep homology of axes is more controversial. This assumption was mainly based on the interpretation of Hox expression data from the sea anemone, but growing evidence from other cnidarian taxa puts into question this hypothesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHox, ParaHox and Hox-related genes have been investigated here by phylogenetic analysis and in situ hybridisation in Clytia hemisphaerica, an hydrozoan species with medusa and polyp stages alternating in the life cycle. Our phylogenetic analyses do not support an origin of ParaHox and Hox genes by duplication of an ancestral ProtoHox cluster, and reveal a diversification of the cnidarian HOX9-14 genes into three groups called A, B, C. Among the 7 examined genes, only those belonging to the HOX9-14 and the CDX groups exhibit a restricted expression along the oral-aboral axis during development and in the planula larva, while the others are expressed in very specialised areas at the medusa stage. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Cross species comparison reveals a strong variability of gene expression along the oral-aboral axis and during the life cycle among cnidarian lineages. The most parsimonious interpretation is that the Hox code, collinearity and conservative role along the antero-posterior axis are bilaterian innovations.

Indexed as

Genes, HomeoboxAnimalsBody PatterningCnidariaEndodermExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationHomeodomain ProteinsModels, BiologicalPhylogenyHomeodomain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19156208
PMCPMC2626245
OpenAlexW2086025948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.