ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2009
Incomplete dissociation of glibenclamide from wild-type and mutant pancreatic K ATP channels limits their recovery from inhibition.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Importance of the Kir6.2 N-terminus for the interaction of glibenclamide and repaglinide with the pancreatic K(ATP) channel.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThe antidiabetic sulphonylurea, glibenclamide, acts by inhibiting the pancreatic ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channel, a tetradimeric complex of K(IR)6.2 and sulphonylurea receptor 1 (K(IR)6.2/SUR1)(4). At room temperature, recovery of channel activity following washout of glibenclamide is very slow and cannot be measured. This study investigates the relation between the recovery of channel activity from glibenclamide inhibition and the dissociation rate of [(3)H]-glibenclamide from the channel at 37 degrees C. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: K(IR)6.2, K(IR)6.2DeltaN5 or K(IR)6.2DeltaN10 (the latter lacking amino-terminal residues 2-5 or 2-10 respectively) were coexpressed with SUR1 in HEK cells. Dissociation of [(3)H]-glibenclamide from the channel and recovery of channel activity from glibenclamide inhibition were determined at 37 degrees C. KEY
resultsThe dissociation kinetics of [(3)H]-glibenclamide from the wild-type channel followed an exponential decay with a dissociation half-time, t(1/2)(D) = 14 min; however, only limited and slow recovery of channel activity was observed. t(1/2)(D) for K(IR)6.2DeltaN5/SUR1 channels was 5.3 min and recovery of channel activity exhibited a sluggish sigmoidal time course with a half-time, t(1/2)(R) = 12 min. t(1/2)(D) for the DeltaN10 channel was 2.3 min; recovery kinetics were again sigmoidal with t(1/2)(R) approximately 4 min. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The dissociation of glibenclamide from the truncated channels is the rate-limiting step of channel recovery. The sigmoidal recovery kinetics are in quantitative agreement with a model where glibenclamide must dissociate from all four (or at least three) sites before the channel reopens. It is argued that these conclusions hold also for the wild-type (pancreatic) K(ATP) channel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.