Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19153134›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009

FrameDP: sensitive peptide detection on noisy matured sequences.

Jérôme Gouzy, Sébastien Carrere, Thomas Schiex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neoproterozoic origin and multiple transitions to macroscopic growth in green seaweeds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Search for potential reading frameshifts in cds from Arabidopsis thaliana and other genomes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Data in brief · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jérôme GouzyLaboratoire Interactions Plantes Micro-organismes (LIPM) UMR441/2594, INRA/CNRS, F-31320 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Sébastien Carrere
Thomas Schiex

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryTranscriptome sequencing represents a fundamental source of information for genome-wide studies and transcriptome analysis and will become increasingly important for expression analysis as new sequencing technologies takes over array technology. The identification of the protein-coding region in transcript sequences is a prerequisite for systematic amino acid-level analysis and more specifically for domain identification. In this article, we present FrameDP, a self-training integrative pipeline for predicting CDS in transcripts which can adapt itself to different levels of sequence qualities. AVAILABILITY: FrameDP for Linux (web-server and underlying pipeline) is available at {{http://iant.toulouse.inra.fr/FrameDP}} for direct use or a standalone installation.

Indexed as

SoftwareGene Expression ProfilingInternetPeptidesSequence Analysis, ProteinPeptides

Identifiers

PMID19153134
PMCPMC2647831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.