Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19150507›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2009

The use of genomics in microbial vaccine development.

Stefania Bambini, Rino Rappuoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Overcoming Immune Evasion inACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Designing a multi-epitope vaccine againstSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Malaria Genomics, Vaccine Development, and Microbiome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Developing Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Vaccinomics to Design a Multi-Epitopes Vaccine forInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Immunology and controlling of coronaviruses; the current enemy for humanity: A review.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefania BambiniNovartis Vaccines, Siena, Italy.
Rino Rappuoli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the most effective tools for the prevention of infectious diseases. The availability of complete genome sequences, together with the progression of high-throughput technologies such as functional and structural genomics, has led to a new paradigm in vaccine development. Pan-genomic reverse vaccinology, with the comparison of sequence data from multiple isolates of the same species of a pathogen, increases the opportunity of the identification of novel vaccine candidates. Overall, the conventional empiric approach to vaccine development is being replaced by vaccine design. The recent development of synthetic genomics may provide a further opportunity to design vaccines.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsBacterial VaccinesCommunicable DiseasesGenome, BacterialGenome, ProtozoanGenome, ViralGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence DataProtozoan VaccinesViral VaccinesBacterial VaccinesProtozoan VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19150507
PMCPMC7108364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.