Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19150357›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2009

Recombineering reveals a diverse collection of ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 that confer resistance to macrolide antibiotics.

Elie J Diner, Christopher S Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Novel features ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Decreased Susceptibility ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Investigation of Macrolide Resistance Genotypes inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Carrion's Disease: the Sound of Silence.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infection and drug resistance · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Macrolide Resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elie J DinerUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, 93106-9610, USA.
Christopher S Hayes
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Molecular determinants of A-site mRNA cleavage ribosomeR01GM078634 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI HAYES, CHRISTOPHER S. · 2006 to 2014
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM078634NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 confer resistance to erythromycin and other macrolide antibiotics in a variety of bacteria. L4 and L22 have elongated loops whose tips converge in the peptide exit tunnel near the macrolide-binding site, and resistance mutations typically affect residues within these loops. Here, we used bacteriophage lambda Red-mediated recombination, or "recombineering," to uncover new L4 and L22 alleles that confer macrolide resistance in Escherichia coli. We randomized residues at the tips of the L4 and L22 loops using recombineered oligonucleotide libraries and selected the mutagenized cells for erythromycin-resistant mutants. These experiments led to the identification of 341 resistance mutations encoding 278 unique L4 and L22 proteins-the overwhelming majority of which are novel. Many resistance mutations were complex, involving multiple missense mutations, in-frame deletions, and insertions. Transfer of L4 and L22 mutations into wild-type cells by phage P1-mediated transduction demonstrated that each allele was sufficient to confer macrolide resistance. Although L4 and L22 mutants are typically resistant to most macrolides, selections carried out on different antibiotics revealed macrolide-specific resistance mutations. L22 Lys90Trp is one such allele that confers resistance to erythromycin but not to tylosin and spiramycin. Purified L22 Lys90Trp ribosomes show reduced erythromycin binding but have the same affinity for tylosin as wild-type ribosomes. Moreover, dimethyl sulfate methylation protection assays demonstrated that L22 Lys90Trp ribosomes bind tylosin more readily than erythromycin in vivo. This work underscores the exceptional functional plasticity of the L4 and L22 proteins and highlights the utility of Red-mediated recombination in targeted genetic selections.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophage lambdaBacteriophage P1Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsINDEL MutationMacrolidesMutation, MissenseRecombination, GeneticRibosomal ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsTransduction, GeneticAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsMacrolidesribosomal protein L4Ribosomal ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsrplV protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID19150357
PMCPMC2644216
OpenAlexW2026198160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.