Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19149885›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2009

Transcriptomic analysis of Arabidopsis developing stems: a close-up on cell wall genes.

Zoran Minic, Elisabeth Jamet, Hélène San-Clemente, Sandra Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Renou, Christophe Rihouey, Denis P O Okinyo, Caroline Proux, Patrice Lerouge, Lise Jouanin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Characterization of a Novel PrMADS11 Transcription Factor fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Zoran MinicDepartment of Chemistry, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. zom198@mail.usask.ca
Elisabeth Jamet
Hélène San-Clemente
Sandra Pelletier
Jean-Pierre Renou
Christophe Rihouey
Denis P O Okinyo
Caroline Proux
Patrice Lerouge
Lise Jouanin
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MALaboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire · FRLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité d'Évry Val-d'Essonne · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent strategies (genetics, biochemistry, and proteomics) can be used to study proteins involved in cell biogenesis. The availability of the complete sequences of several plant genomes allowed the development of transcriptomic studies. Although the expression patterns of some Arabidopsis thaliana genes involved in cell wall biogenesis were identified at different physiological stages, detailed microarray analysis of plant cell wall genes has not been performed on any plant tissues. Using transcriptomic and bioinformatic tools, we studied the regulation of cell wall genes in Arabidopsis stems, i.e. genes encoding proteins involved in cell wall biogenesis and genes encoding secreted proteins.

resultsTranscriptomic analyses of stems were performed at three different developmental stages, i.e., young stems, intermediate stage, and mature stems. Many genes involved in the synthesis of cell wall components such as polysaccharides and monolignols were identified. A total of 345 genes encoding predicted secreted proteins with moderate or high level of transcripts were analyzed in details. The encoded proteins were distributed into 8 classes, based on the presence of predicted functional domains. Proteins acting on carbohydrates and proteins of unknown function constituted the two most abundant classes. Other proteins were proteases, oxido-reductases, proteins with interacting domains, proteins involved in signalling, and structural proteins. Particularly high levels of expression were established for genes encoding pectin methylesterases, germin-like proteins, arabinogalactan proteins, fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins, and structural proteins. Finally, the results of this transcriptomic analyses were compared with those obtained through a cell wall proteomic analysis from the same material. Only a small proportion of genes identified by previous proteomic analyses were identified by transcriptomics. Conversely, only a few proteins encoded by genes having moderate or high level of transcripts were identified by proteomics.

conclusionAnalysis of the genes predicted to encode cell wall proteins revealed that about 345 genes had moderate or high levels of transcripts. Among them, we identified many new genes possibly involved in cell wall biogenesis. The discrepancies observed between results of this transcriptomic study and a previous proteomic study on the same material revealed post-transcriptional mechanisms of regulation of expression of genes encoding cell wall proteins.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingArabidopsisCell WallComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGlycoside HydrolasesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlant StemsRNA, PlantXylansGlycoside HydrolasesRNA, PlantXylans

Identifiers

PMID19149885
PMCPMC2649120
OpenAlexW2126191743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.