Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19148921›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2009

Efficacy of immobilized polyplexes and lipoplexes for substrate-mediated gene delivery.

Zain Bengali, Jennifer C Rea, Romie F Gibly, Lonnie D Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Localized lentivirus delivery via peptide interactions.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Liposomes in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in cells transfected with nonviral vectors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Balancing cell migration with matrix degradation enhances gene delivery to cells cultured three-dimensionally within hydrogels.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2010
    Article
  15. Lentivirus delivery by adsorption to tissue engineering scaffolds.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zain BengaliDepartment of Interdepartmental Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Jennifer C Rea
Romie F Gibly
Lonnie D Shea

Funding

Regenerative Scaffold Technologies for CNS and DiabetesR01EB003806 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI STUPP, SAMUEL I · 2004 to 2015
$10.7M
Substrate mediated DNA deliveryR01GM066830 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEA, LONNIE D · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB003806NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003806NIGMS NIH HHS GM066830NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-viral gene delivery by immobilization of complexes to cell-adhesive biomaterials, a process termed substrate-mediated delivery, has many in vitro research applications such as transfected cell arrays or models of tissue growth. In this report, we quantitatively investigate the efficiency of gene delivery by surface immobilization, and compare this efficiency to the more typical bolus delivery. The ability to immobilize vectors while allowing cellular internalization is impacted by the biomaterial and vector properties. Thus, to compare this efficiency between vector types and delivery methods, transfection conditions were initially identified that maximized transgene expression. For surface delivery from tissue culture polystyrene, DNA complexes were immobilized to pre-adsorbed serum proteins prior to cell seeding, while for bolus delivery, complexes were added to the media above adherent cells. Mathematical modeling of vector binding, release, and cell association using a two-site model indicated that the kinetics of polyplex binding to cells was faster than for lipoplexes, yet both vectors have a half-life on the surface of approximately 17 min. For bolus and surface delivery, the majority of the DNA in the system remained in solution or on the surface, respectively. For polyplexes, the efficiency of trafficking of cell-associated polyplexes to the nucleus for surface delivery is similar or less than bolus delivery, suggesting that surface immobilization may decrease the activity of the complex. The efficiency of nuclear association for cell-associated lipoplexes is similar or greater for surface delivery relative to bolus. These studies suggest that strategies to enhance surface delivery for polyplexes should target the vector design to enhance its potency, whereas enhancing lipoplex delivery should target the material design to increase internalization.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAlgorithmsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDNAGenetic VectorsIminesImmobilized ProteinsKineticsLipid MetabolismLysosomesMiceModels, MolecularNIH 3T3 CellsPlasmidsPolyethylenesDNAIminesImmobilized Proteinspoly(ethylene imine)Polyethylenes

Identifiers

PMID19148921
PMCPMC2911033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.