Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19147639›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Does single application of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds reduce incidence of wound infection after minor surgery? Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind trial.

Clare F Heal, Petra G Buettner, Robert Cruickshank, David Graham, Sheldon Browning, Jayne Pendergast, Herwig Drobetz, Robert Gluer, Carl Lisec

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Alcoholic versus aqueous chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis: the AVALANCHE trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.Australian prescriber · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Minor surgery activity in primary care.JRSM short reports · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Clare F HealJames Cook University, School of Medicine, Mackay Base Hospital, Queensland 4740, Australia. clare.heal@jcu.edu.au
Petra G Buettner
Robert Cruickshank
David Graham
Sheldon Browning
Jayne Pendergast
Herwig Drobetz
Robert Gluer
Carl Lisec
James Cook University · AUMackay Base Hospital · AUWalker (United States) · USTescan (Czechia) · CZTownsville Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of a single application of topical chloramphenicol ointment in preventing wound infection after minor dermatological surgery.

designProspective randomised placebo controlled double blind multicentre trial.

settingPrimary care in a regional centre in Queensland, Australia.

participants972 minor surgery patients.

interventionsA single topical dose of chloramphenicol (n=488) or paraffin ointment (n=484; placebo).

main outcome measureIncidence of infection.

resultsThe incidence of infection in the chloramphenicol group (6.6%; 95% confidence interval 4.9 to 8.8) was significantly lower than that in the control group (11.0%; 7.9 to 15.1) (P=0.010). The absolute reduction in infection rate was 4.4%, the relative reduction was 40%, and the relative risk of wound infection in the control group was 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.5) times higher than in the intervention group. The number needed to treat was 22.8.

conclusionApplication of a single dose of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds after minor surgery produces a moderate absolute reduction in infection rate that is statistically but not clinically significant. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73223053.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdministration, TopicalAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChloramphenicolDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsSkin NeoplasmsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChloramphenicol

Identifiers

PMID19147639
PMCPMC2628297
OpenAlexW2027917292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.