Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19147354›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2009

Establishing new sites of polarization by microtubules.

Nicolas Minc, Scott V Bratman, Roshni Basu, Fred Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell Polarity in Yeast.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Chimera proteins with affinity for membranes and microtubule tips polarize in the membrane of fission yeast cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicolas MincDepartment of Microbiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 701W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Scott V Bratman
Roshni Basu
Fred Chang
Columbia University · US

Funding

ASSEMBLY AND PLACEMENT OF THE CELL DIVISION RINGR01GM056836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHANG, FRED · 1998 to 2018
$7.4M
Nuclear Positioning and Microtubule OrganizationR01GM069670 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHANG, FRED · 2005 to 2012
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM056836NIGMS NIH HHS GM069670NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056836NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrotubules (MTs) participate in the spatial regulation of actin-based processes such as cytokinesis and cell polarization. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a rod-shaped cell that exhibits polarized cell growth at cell tips. MT plus ends contact and shrink from the cell tips and contribute to polarity regulation.

resultsHere, we investigate the effects of changing cell shape on MTs and cell-polarization machinery. We physically bend fission yeast cells by forcing them into microfabricated femtoliter chambers. In these bent cells, MTs maintain a straight axis and contact and shrink from cortical sites at the sides of cells. At these ectopic sites, polarity factors such as bud6p, for3p (formin), and cdc42p are recruited and assemble actin cables in a MT-dependent manner. MT contact at the cortex induces the appearance of a bud6p dot within seconds. The accumulation of polarity factors leads to cell growth at these sites, when the MT-associated polarity factor tea1p is absent. This process is dependent on MTs, mal3p (EB1), moe1p (an EB1-binding protein), and for3p but, surprisingly, is independent of the tea1p-tea4p pathway.

conclusionsThese studies provide a direct demonstration for how MTs induce actin assembly at specific locations on the cell cortex and begin to identify a new pathway involved in this process. MT interactions with the cortex may be regulated by cortical-attachment sites. These findings highlight the crosstalk between cell shape, polarity mechanisms, and MTs responsible for cell morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeActinsBinding SitesCell PolarityCytoskeletonMicrofilament ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsStress, MechanicalActinsBud6 protein, S pombeMicrofilament ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTea1 protein, S pombe

Identifiers

PMID19147354
PMCPMC2820583
OpenAlexW2059588721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.