Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19147119›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2009

Genome-wide linkage scan reveals three putative breast-cancer-susceptibility loci.

Juan Manuel Rosa-Rosa, Guillermo Pita, Miguel Urioste, Gemma Llort, Joan Brunet, Conxi Lázaro, Ignacio Blanco, Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Orland Díez, Miguel de la Hoya and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cancer evolution and individual susceptibility.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2011
    Review
  15. Article
  16. [Genes beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 for hereditary breast cancer].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Manuel Rosa-RosaHuman Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Pita
Miguel Urioste
Gemma Llort
Joan Brunet
Conxi Lázaro
Ignacio Blanco
Teresa Ramón y Cajal
Orland Díez
Miguel de la Hoya
Trinidad Caldés
Maria-Isabel Tejada
Anna González-Neira
Javier Benítez
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESHospital de Cruces · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite all the research efforts made during the last few decades, most of the cases of families with breast cancer remain unexplained. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, and in other breast-cancer-susceptibility genes, account for about 25% of familial breast cancer. Linkage studies have failed to identify other breast-cancer-susceptibility genes. The selection criteria of the families, differences in the population background, or clinical and genetic heterogeneity, among other factors, might determine the power to detect the linkage signal. We have performed a SNP-based linkage scan with a total of 6000 SNP markers across the genome in 41 breast-cancer Spanish families, with an average of four breast-cancer cases per family not associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. In addition, we have included three BRCA-positive families to test the power in linkage detection from a low-complexity family in which a high-penetrance mutation segregates. We have identified three regions of interest, located on 3q25, 6q24, and 21q22. The two former regions showed a suggestive linkage signal (HLOD scores 3.01 and 2.26, respectively), and the latter region showed a significant linkage signal (HLOD score 3.55). Moreover, we found that a subset of 13 families with bilateral breast cancer presented a HLOD of 3.13 on the 3q25 region. Our results suggest that several variables must be taken into account before performing a linkage study in familial breast cancer because of the high heterogeneity within non-BRCA1/2 families. Phenotypic and geographic homogeneity could be the most important factors.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanBreast NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6FamilyFemaleFunctional LateralityGenetic MarkersGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19147119
PMCPMC2668009
OpenAlexW2012262773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.