Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19146970›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2009

The 2008 update of the Aspergillus nidulans genome annotation: a community effort.

Jennifer Russo Wortman, Jane Mabey Gilsenan, Vinita Joardar, Jennifer Deegan, John Clutterbuck, Mikael R Andersen, David Archer, Mojca Bencina, Gerhard Braus, Pedro Coutinho and 76 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Functional analysis ofMycoscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. TheFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Comparative analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transcription Factors in the FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

86 authors.

Jennifer Russo WortmanDepartment of Medicine Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jane Mabey Gilsenan
Vinita Joardar
Jennifer Deegan
John Clutterbuck
Mikael R Andersen
David Archer
Mojca Bencina
Gerhard Braus
Pedro Coutinho
Hans von Döhren
John Doonan
Arnold J M Driessen
Pawel Durek
Eduardo Espeso
Erzsébet Fekete
Michel Flipphi
Carlos Garcia Estrada
Steven Geysens
Gustavo Goldman
Piet W J de Groot
Kim Hansen
Steven D Harris
Thorsten Heinekamp
Kerstin Helmstaedt
Bernard Henrissat
Gerald Hofmann
Tim Homan
Tetsuya Horio
Hiroyuki Horiuchi
Steve James
Meriel Jones
Levente Karaffa
Zsolt Karányi
Masashi Kato
Nancy Keller
Diane E Kelly
Jan A K W Kiel
Jung-Mi Kim
Ida J van der Klei
Frans M Klis
Andriy Kovalchuk
Nada Krasevec
Christian P Kubicek
Bo Liu
Andrew Maccabe
Vera Meyer
Pete Mirabito
Márton Miskei
Magdalena Mos
Jonathan Mullins
David R Nelson
Jens Nielsen
Berl R Oakley
Stephen A Osmani
Tiina Pakula
Andrzej Paszewski
Ian Paulsen
Sebastian Pilsyk
István Pócsi
Peter J Punt
Arthur F J Ram
Qinghu Ren
Xavier Robellet
Geoff Robson
Bernhard Seiboth
Piet van Solingen
Thomas Specht
Jibin Sun
Naimeh Taheri-Talesh
Norio Takeshita
Dave Ussery
Patricia A vanKuyk
Hans Visser
Peter J I van de Vondervoort
Ronald P de Vries
Jonathan Walton
Xin Xiang
Yi Xiong
An Ping Zeng
Bernd W Brandt
Michael J Cornell
Cees A M J J van den Hondel
Jacob Visser
Stephen G Oliver
Geoffrey Turner

Funding

THE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF ORGNELLAR TRANSLOCATIONR01GM031837 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI OAKLEY, BERL RAY · 1985 to 2009
$2.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F004389/1NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030071NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification and annotation of protein-coding genes is one of the primary goals of whole-genome sequencing projects, and the accuracy of predicting the primary protein products of gene expression is vital to the interpretation of the available data and the design of downstream functional applications. Nevertheless, the comprehensive annotation of eukaryotic genomes remains a considerable challenge. Many genomes submitted to public databases, including those of major model organisms, contain significant numbers of wrong and incomplete gene predictions. We present a community-based reannotation of the Aspergillus nidulans genome with the primary goal of increasing the number and quality of protein functional assignments through the careful review of experts in the field of fungal biology.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalGenome, FungalGenomicsAspergillus nidulansFungal ProteinsFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19146970
PMCPMC2826280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.