Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19144816›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Comparison of probe hybridization array typing to multilocus sequence typing for pathogenic Escherichia coli.

Sara E McNamara, Usha Srinivasan, Lixin Zhang, Thomas S Whittam, Carl F Marrs, Betsy Foxman

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara E McNamaraDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Usha Srinivasan
Lixin Zhang
Thomas S Whittam
Carl F Marrs
Betsy Foxman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probe hybridization array typing (PHAT) is a previously validated, high-throughput, highly discriminatory binary typing method based on the presence or absence of genetic material. To increase the utility of PHAT, we identified a refined PHAT probe set using 24 known and potential Escherichia coli virulence genes, by which groups similar to multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clonal groups (CGs) could be determined. We PHAT typed 1,132 E. coli isolates, representing at least 62 MLST CGs and diverse disease states, using a "library-on-a-slide" microarray format. Using 24 PHAT probes, all 62 MLST CGs in the representative E. coli collection were distinguished. For major CGs, PHAT correctly classified all sequence types within CG7 and CG17 but misclassified between one and four sequence types for CG13, CG14, CG23, CG38, and CG58, giving an overall sensitivity and specificity of 80.4 and 98.7%, respectively. After application of the PHAT classification to the whole collection, MLST validation of the PHAT probe classification resulted in sensitivities from 0.0 to 100.0% and specificities from 75.0 to 100.0% for individual CGs and an overall sensitivity and specificity of 64.7 and 88.3%, respectively. The refined PHAT probe set is capable of classifying isolates into groups in a manner similar to major clonal complexes of MLST, indicating coevolution between the chromosomal background and the flexible gene pool. Further refinement is needed to distinguish between closely related groups. For analysis of large bacterial collections, PHAT is a relatively time- and cost-efficient method and is ideal for a first level of analysis.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliGenotypeHumansMaleNucleic Acid HybridizationSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19144816
PMCPMC2650935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.