Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19144813›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Role of SCCmec type in outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a single medical center.

Roopa Ganga, Kathleen Riederer, Mamta Sharma, Mohamad G Fakih, Leonard B Johnson, Stephen Shemes, Riad Khatib

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. InJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  5. InbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Persistent Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Staphylococcal Cassette ChromosomeInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  9. A new simplified predictive model for mortality in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is methicillin-resistantRisk management and healthcare policy · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Association between Accessory Gene Regulator Polymorphism and Mortality among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin for Nosocomial MRSA Bacteremia: A Cohort Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Where does a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine stand?Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2014
    Review
  19. Association between susceptibility to photodynamic oxidation and the genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roopa GangaSt. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan 48236, USA.
Kathleen Riederer
Mamta Sharma
Mohamad G Fakih
Leonard B Johnson
Stephen Shemes
Riad Khatib
St. John Hospital & Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors may determine infection presentation. Whether SCCmec type-associated factors play a role in S. aureus bacteremia is unclear. We conducted a prospective observation of adult inpatients with S. aureus bacteremia (1 November 2005 to 31 December 2006), performed SCCmec typing of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, and stratified the results according to SCCmec type. We studied 253 patients. MRSA accounted for 163 (64.4%) cases. The illness severity index was similar in MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) cases. MRSA caused higher in-hospital mortality (23.9% versus 8.9%; P=0.003), longer bacteremia (4.7+/-6.5 days versus 2.7+/-2.9 days; P=0.01), but similar metastatic infection (14.7% versus 15.6%). Stratifying the results according to SCCmec type revealed significant differences. SCCmec type II caused highest mortality (33.3%) versus type IVa (13.5%), other MRSA (12.5%), and MSSA (8.9%). SCCmec IVa produced the highest metastatic infection (26.9% versus 9.1% [SCCmec II], 8.3% [other MRSA], and 15.6% [MSSA]). Persistent bacteremia (>or= 7 days) was similar in all SCCmec types (16.7 to 20.7%); each exceeded MSSA (6.7%; P=0.05). In multivariate analysis, SCCmec II was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR]=3.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.81 to 7.66; P=0.009), SCCmec IVa was a predictor of metastatic infection (OR=3.52; CI=1.50 to 8.23; P=0.004), and MRSA (independent of SCCmec type) was a predictor of persistent bacteremia (OR=4.16; CI=1.47 to 11.73; P=0.007). These findings suggest that SCCmec-associated virulence factors play a role in the outcome of S. aureus bacteremia. Additional studies are needed to identify which virulence factors are the determinants of increased mortality with SCCmec type II and metastatic infection with SCCmec type IVa.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteremiaBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialFemaleGenotypeHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19144813
PMCPMC2650895
OpenAlexW2117179726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.