ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009
Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pseudogout After Total Knee Arthroplasty Meeting Minor Criteria for Infection Treated by Polyethylene Exchange.Orthopedic reviews · 2023Article
- Automated Scoring of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Use of WASPLab Image Analysis Software.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Evaluation of Genotypic and Phenotypic Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Eastern Odisha.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Foaming Betadine Spray as a potential agent for non-labor-intensive preoperative surgical site preparation.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2015Article
- Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Military Medical Research · 2015Article
- Analysis of reporting time for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers using ChromID MRSA.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2014Article
- Three-way comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSASelect, and spectra MRSA for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in nasal surveillance cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Evaluation of Bio-Rad MRSASelect agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An incubation time of 24 h at 35 to 38 degrees C is recommended for the optimal performance of MRSASelect (Bio-Rad) chromogenic screening agar. An additional 24 h is required to capture slow-growing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, the normal hours of operation for most laboratories cannot reliably accommodate 24-h interpretation intervals. Daily agar plate interpretations are more likely to occur around 18 h and 42 h of incubation, which may compromise the performance of the chromogenic agar and negatively impact patient infection control efforts. In order to validate the importance of stringent incubation times to plate performance, we evaluated MRSASelect medium at controlled intervals of 24 and 48 h of incubation, using clinical MRSA-screening swabs. A total of 1,071 MRSA-positive and 2,733 MRSA-negative cultures were selected for analysis. Compared to 48-h-incubation results, the sensitivity and specificity of MRSASelect at 24 h were 98.3% and 98.2%, respectively. Only 19 of 1,071 (1.8%) MRSA-positive isolates required 48 h for detection. Holding 24-h negative plates an additional 24 h resulted in the workup of 253 (6.6%) pink, yet non-MRSA, colonies. The 24-h positive and negative predictive values of MRSASelect, assuming MRSA prevalences of 1, 5, and 10%, were 35.5 and 99.98%, 74.2 and 99.9%, and 85.9 and 99.8%, respectively. MRSASelect medium held for 24-h incubation is a highly sensitive and specific MRSA-screening tool. Further incubation prolongs the turnaround time for results and creates a significant amount of unnecessary work in the laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.