Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19144246›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2009

Host condition and individual risk of cowpox virus infection in natural animal populations: cause or effect?

P M Beldomenico, S Telfer, L Lukomski, S Gebert, M Bennett, M Begon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On the Doorstep, Rodents in Homesteads and Kitchen Gardens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P M BeldomenicoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK. pbeldome@fcv.unl.edu.ar
S Telfer
L Lukomski
S Gebert
M Bennett
M Begon
University of Liverpool · GBNational Consortium for Zoonosis Research · GBNational University of the Littoral · AR

Funding

Wellcome Trust 075202Wellcome Trust 075202/Z/04/ZWellcome Trust 081705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have provided evidence that endemic pathogens may affect dynamics in animals. However, such studies have not typically considered that infected individuals might have a preceding underlying poor condition. We examined whether individuals in poor condition are more likely to become infected by an endemic pathogen, using as a system the dynamics of cowpox virus in field voles. With data from monthly sampled vole populations, a nested case-control study evaluated whether susceptible individuals with poorer condition had higher probabilities of contracting cowpox. The influence of condition was found to be considerable, especially for males. At times when a susceptible male with good body condition had a relatively low probability of becoming infected, a susceptible male with poor body condition was twice as likely to contract cowpox; if this male was also anaemic, the chances were almost quadrupled. We discuss the care needed when interpreting the findings of wildlife disease studies.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaeAnemiaAnimalsCase-Control StudiesCowpoxEndemic DiseasesFemaleMalePopulation DynamicsPopulation SurveillanceSex FactorsTreesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID19144246
PMCPMC2952828
OpenAlexW2116608839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.