Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19144191›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2009

Combining chemical genomics screens in yeast to reveal spectrum of effects of chemical inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis.

Danielle Kemmer, Lianne M McHardy, Shawn Hoon, Delphine Rebérioux, Guri Giaever, Corey Nislow, Calvin D Roskelley, Michel Roberge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle KemmerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. dakemmer@interchange.ubc.ca
Lianne M McHardy
Shawn Hoon
Delphine Rebérioux
Guri Giaever
Corey Nislow
Calvin D Roskelley
Michel Roberge
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle genome-wide screens for the effect of altered gene dosage on drug sensitivity in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae provide only a partial picture of the mechanism of action of a drug.

resultsUsing the example of the tumor cell invasion inhibitor dihydromotuporamine C, we show that a more complete picture of drug action can be obtained by combining different chemical genomics approaches--analysis of the sensitivity of rho0 cells lacking mitochondrial DNA, drug-induced haploinsufficiency, suppression of drug sensitivity by gene overexpression and chemical-genetic synthetic lethality screening using strains deleted of nonessential genes. Killing of yeast by this chemical requires a functional mitochondrial electron-transport chain and cytochrome c heme lyase function. However, we find that it does not require genes associated with programmed cell death in yeast. The chemical also inhibits endocytosis and intracellular vesicle trafficking and interferes with vacuolar acidification in yeast and in human cancer cells. These effects can all be ascribed to inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis by dihydromotuporamine C.

conclusionDespite their similar conceptual basis, namely altering drug sensitivity by modifying gene dosage, each of the screening approaches provided a distinct set of information that, when integrated, revealed a more complete picture of the mechanism of action of a drug on cells.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCell DeathCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, FungalGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalGenomicsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLyasesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMitochondriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic Agentscytochrome C synthetasedihydromotuporamine CHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingLyasesPropylaminesSphingolipids

Identifiers

PMID19144191
PMCPMC2632640
OpenAlexW2024950225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.