Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19144162›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2009

Evaluating real-time internet therapy and online self-help for problematic alcohol consumers: a three-arm RCT protocol.

Matthijs Blankers, Maarten Koeter, Gerard M Schippers

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthijs BlankersAmsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Room PB 0.425, PO Box 75867, 1070 AW Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.blankers@amc.uva.nl
Maarten Koeter
Gerard M Schippers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly a minority of all alcohol- and drug abusers is receiving professional care. In an attempt to narrow this treatment gap, treatment facilities experiment with online healthcare. Therefore, it is important to test the (cost-)effectiveness of online health interventions in a randomized clinical trial.

methodsThis paper presents the protocol of a three-arm randomized clinical trial to test the (cost-) effectiveness of online treatment for problem drinkers. Self-help online, therapy online and a waiting list are tested against each other. Primary outcome is change in alcohol consumption. Secondary outcome measures include quality of life and working ability. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for self-help online alcohol and therapy online alcohol will be calculated. The predictive validity of participant characteristics on treatment adherence and outcome will be explored. DISCUSSION: To our best knowledge, this randomized clinical trial will be the first to test the effectiveness of therapy online against both self-help online and a waiting-list. It will provide evidence on (cost-) effectiveness of online treatment for problem drinkers and investigate outcome predictors.

trial registrationThis trial is registered in the Dutch Trialregister (Cochrane Collaboration) and traceable as NTR-TC1155.

Indexed as

Self-Help GroupsAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingAnalysis of VarianceCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID19144162
PMCPMC2636801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.