Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19142764›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neuropsychology2009

Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child outcomes: real or spurious effect?

Valerie S Knopik

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neuropsychology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nicotine and Cytisine Embryotoxicity in the Experimental Zebrafish Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerie S KnopikDepartment of Community Health, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. valerie_knopik@brown.edu
John Brown University · US

Funding

Externalizing Behavior: Genetics x Prenatal NicotineK01DA017671 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KNOPIK, VALERIE S · 2004 to 2008
$813k
NIDA NIH HHS DA17671NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA017671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP) is a major public health concern with clearly established consequences to both mother and newborn (e.g., low birth weight, altered cardiorespiratory responses). MSDP has also been associated with higher rates of a variety of poor cognitive and behavioral outcomes in children, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), conduct disorder, impaired learning and memory, and cognitive dysfunction. However, the evidence suggesting causal effects of MSDP for these outcomes is muddied in the existing literature due to the frequent inability to separate prenatal exposure effects from other confounding environmental and genetic factors. Carefully designed studies using genetically sensitive strategies can build on current evidence and begin to elucidate the likely complex factors contributing to associations between MSDP and child outcomes.

Indexed as

Maternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsChildDevelopmental DisabilitiesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansPregnancySmoking

Identifiers

PMID19142764
PMCPMC3581055
OpenAlexW2139334238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.