Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19142669›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2009

Use of a lidocaine patch in the management of postsurgical neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: a phase III double-blind crossover study (N01CB).

Andrea L Cheville, Jeff A Sloan, Donald W Northfelt, Anand P Jillella, Gilbert Y Wong, James D Bearden Iii, Heshan Liu, Paul L Schaefer, Benjamin T Marchello, Bradley J Christensen and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00058357 phase3completednot on this map

The Efficacy Of Lidocaine Patch In The Management Of Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain In Patients With Cancer: A Phase III Double-Blind, Crossover Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2004 to 2007Enrolled30ConditionsPain, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificArmslidocaine, placebo
NCT04570293 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The PATCH Trial: Effectiveness and Safety of 5% Lidocaine-medicated Plaster for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled226ConditionsTrigeminal NeuralgiaArms5% lidocaine medicated plaster, vehicle plaster
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Lidocaine 5 % patches as an effective short-term co-analgesic in cancer pain. Preliminary results.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Topical Lidocaine for Chronic Pain Treatment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Treatment of acute and chronic focal neuropathic pain in cancer patients with lidocaine 5 % patches. A radiation and oncology department experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea L ChevilleMayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Jeff A Sloan
Donald W Northfelt
Anand P Jillella
Gilbert Y Wong
James D Bearden Iii
Heshan Liu
Paul L Schaefer
Benjamin T Marchello
Bradley J Christensen
Charles L Loprinzi
Mayo Clinic · USAugusta University · USCommunity Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of South Carolina Upstate · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
SUPPLEMENTU10CA037404 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOPRINZI, CHARLES L · 1985 to 2014
$34.8M
UPSTATE CAROLINA COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035119 · NCI · SPARTANBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI BEARDEN, JAMES D · 1985 to 2013
$21.5M
SIOUX COMMUNITY CANCER CONSORTIUMU10CA035103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI MAZURCZAK, MIROSLAW · 1985 to 2014
$11.6M
Illinois Oncology Research Association Community Clinical Oncology ProgramU10CA035113 · NCI · ONCOLOGY-HEMATOLOGY ASSOC-CENTRAL ILL · PI LE-LINDQWISTER, NGUYET A. · 1985 to 2014
$10.8M
TOLEDO COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035415 · NCI · TOLEDO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY PROG · PI MOWAT, REX BRADLEY · 1985 to 2014
$9.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA-25224NCI NIH HHS CA-35103NCI NIH HHS CA-35113NCI NIH HHS CA-35119NCI NIH HHS CA-35415NCI NIH HHS CA-37404NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035119NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035103NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035113NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035119NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035415NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037404NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrent therapies often have limited efficacy and untenable side effects when used to treat persistent incisional pain following cancer-related surgery. Lidocaine patches reduce neuropathic pain from herpes zoster but their benefits for persistent cancer-related postsurgical incisional pain remain unclear. STUDY

designMulticenter, double-blind, randomized, two-period crossover trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-eight cancer patients with postsurgical incisional pain were randomly assigned to receive either lidocaine patches followed by placebo patches or the reverse. Each study period lasted 4 weeks. Patches were applied daily upon waking and left in place for a maximum of 18 h. The primary outcome measure, an 11-point pain intensity rating scale, was administered weekly. Secondary outcomes were administered weekly (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form(BPI-SF), Subject Global Impression of Change) and at the end of each study period (Short Form-Magill Pain Questionnaire, Linear Analogue Self Assessment Scale, Neuropathy Pain Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Profile of Mood States Short Form).

resultsTwenty-one patients completed the first period and 18 completed their crossover second phase. No significant intergroup differences were detected in pain intensity ratings. Few secondary end points were significantly different when subjects used the lidocaine versus placebo patches. BPI-SF interference scores were lower in patients using the lidocaine patch during the first study period, including several scores that achieved statistical significance, general activity (p = 0.02), work (p = 0.04), and relations with others (p = 0.02).

conclusionLidocaine patch use did not significantly reduce pain intensity ratings or the majority of related secondary end points in cancer patients with persistent incisional pain.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAgedAnesthetics, LocalCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeuralgiaPain MeasurementPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID19142669
PMCPMC5653964
OpenAlexW2067399411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.