Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19141673›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2009

An in vitro ES cell imprinting model shows that imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene arises from an allele-specific expression bias.

Paulina A Latos, Stefan H Stricker, Laura Steenpass, Florian M Pauler, Ru Huang, Basak H Senergin, Kakkad Regha, Martha V Koerner, Katarzyna E Warczok, Christine Unger and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why are imprints unstable in pluripotent stem cells?Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Imprinted Long Non-Coding RNAs in Mammalian Development and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic imprinting in mammals.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulina A LatosCeMM-Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dr Bohr-Gasse 9/4, Vienna Biocenter, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
Stefan H Stricker
Laura Steenpass
Florian M Pauler
Ru Huang
Basak H Senergin
Kakkad Regha
Martha V Koerner
Katarzyna E Warczok
Christine Unger
Denise P Barlow
CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 1718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic process that results in parental-specific gene expression. Advances in understanding the mechanism that regulates imprinted gene expression in mammals have largely depended on generating targeted manipulations in embryonic stem (ES) cells that are analysed in vivo in mice. However, genomic imprinting consists of distinct developmental steps, some of which occur in post-implantation embryos, indicating that they could be studied in vitro in ES cells. The mouse Igf2r gene shows imprinted expression only in post-implantation stages, when repression of the paternal allele has been shown to require cis-expression of the Airn non-coding (nc) RNA and to correlate with gain of DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications. Here we follow the gain of imprinted expression of Igf2r during in vitro ES cell differentiation and show that it coincides with the onset of paternal-specific expression of the Airn ncRNA. Notably, although Airn ncRNA expression leads, as predicted, to gain of repressive epigenetic marks on the paternal Igf2r promoter, we unexpectedly find that the paternal Igf2r promoter is expressed at similar low levels throughout ES cell differentiation. Our results further show that the maternal and paternal Igf2r promoters are expressed equally in undifferentiated ES cells, but during differentiation expression of the maternal Igf2r promoter increases up to 10-fold, while expression from the paternal Igf2r promoter remains constant. This indicates, contrary to expectation, that the Airn ncRNA induces imprinted Igf2r expression not by silencing the paternal Igf2r promoter, but by generating an expression bias between the two parental alleles.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEmbryonic Stem CellsEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesMicePromoter Regions, GeneticReceptor, IGF Type 2RNA, UntranslatedHistonesReceptor, IGF Type 2RNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID19141673
PMCPMC2846269
OpenAlexW2001210792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.