Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19141597›Full record

ArticleGenome research2009

Genomic copy number determination in cancer cells from single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays based on quantitative genotyping corrected for aneuploidy.

Edward F Attiyeh, Sharon J Diskin, Marc A Attiyeh, Yaël P Mossé, Cuiping Hou, Eric M Jackson, Cecilia Kim, Joseph Glessner, Hakon Hakonarson, Jaclyn A Biegel and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Crizotinib Synergizes with Chemotherapy in Preclinical Models of Neuroblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Edward F AttiyehChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4318, USA. attiyeh@chop.edu
Sharon J Diskin
Marc A Attiyeh
Yaël P Mossé
Cuiping Hou
Eric M Jackson
Cecilia Kim
Joseph Glessner
Hakon Hakonarson
Jaclyn A Biegel
John M Maris

Funding

COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
The Genetic Basis of Neuroblastoma TumorigenesisR01CA124709 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MARIS, JOHN M · 2008 to 2017
$6.3M
Significance of Genetic Alterations in NeuroblastomaR01CA087847 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MARIS, JOHN M · 2002 to 2006
$1.2M
Discovery of Chromosome Arm 11q Tumor Suppressor Genes in NeuroblastomaK08CA123100 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ATTIYEH, EDWARD F · 2006 to 2010
$697k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA123100NCI NIH HHS K08CA123100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087847NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124709NCI NIH HHS R01-CA87847NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10-CA98543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarrays are frequently used to profile genome-wide copy number (CN) aberrations. While generally robust for detecting CN variants in germline DNA, the methods used to derive CN from signal intensity values have been suboptimal when applied to cancer genomes. The complexity of genomic aberrations in cancer makes it more difficult to discriminate between signal and noise, and measuring CN as a discrete variable does not account for tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, standard normalization approaches detect CN changes relative to the overall DNA content, which is often not diploid in cancer. We propose an algorithm that uses the degree of allelic imbalance as well as probe intensity, with a correction for aneuploidy, for a quantitative CN assessment and scoring of allelic ratios. This algorithm results in a more precise definition of CN and allelic aberration in the cancer genome, which is essential for translational efforts focused on using these tools for molecular diagnostics and for the discovery of therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Gene DosagePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAneuploidyCalibrationChildGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTransformation, GeneticTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

PMID19141597
PMCPMC2652209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.