Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19141533›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2009

Nuclear reprogramming in heterokaryons is rapid, extensive, and bidirectional.

Adam Palermo, Regis Doyonnas, Nidhi Bhutani, Jason Pomerantz, Ozan Alkan, Helen M Blau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cell Fusion in Reprogramming and Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Conserved pathway activation following xenogeneic, heterotypic fusion.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AID hits the jackpot when missing the target.Current opinion in immunology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam PalermoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Stem Cell Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, 269 Campus Dr., Stanford, CA 94305-5175, USA.
Regis Doyonnas
Nidhi Bhutani
Jason Pomerantz
Ozan Alkan
Helen M Blau
Stanford University · USBroad Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Stem Cells for Brain and BrawnR01AG020961 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2002 to 2019
$5.0M
ACTIVATORS OF MUSCLE GENESR01AG009521 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 1990 to 2014
$4.7M
REGULATION OF MUSCLE DEVELOPMENTR01HD018179 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 1985 to 2007
$2.7M
ACTIVATORS OF HUMAN MUSCLE GENESR37AG009521 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 1995 to 2004
$2.3M
Regulator of Adult Stem Cell FateR01AG024987 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
ACF HHS AF051678NIA NIH HHS AG009521NIA NIH HHS AG020961NIA NIH HHS AG024987NIA NIH HHS R01 AG009521NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020961NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024987NIA NIH HHS R37 AG009521NICHD NIH HHS HD018179NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD018179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An understanding of nuclear reprogramming is fundamental to the use of cells in regenerative medicine. Due to technological obstacles, the time course and extent of reprogramming of cells following fusion has not been assessed to date. Here, we show that hundreds of genes are activated or repressed within hours of fusion of human keratinocytes and mouse muscle cells in heterokaryons, and extensive changes are observed within 4 days. This study was made possible by the development of a broadly applicable approach, species-specific transcriptome amplification (SSTA), which enables global resolution of transcripts derived from the nuclei of two species, even when the proportions of species-specific transcripts are highly skewed. Remarkably, either phenotype can be dominant; an excess of primary keratinocytes leads to activation of the keratinocyte program in muscle cells and the converse is true when muscle cells are in excess. We conclude that nuclear reprogramming in heterokaryons is rapid, extensive, bidirectional, and dictated by the balance of regulators contributed by the cell types.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell FusionGene Expression ProfilingHumansHybrid CellsKeratinocytesMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID19141533
PMCPMC2669427
OpenAlexW2122749517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.