Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19140774›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2009

Perspective on optical biosensors and integrated sensor systems.

Frances S Ligler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recombinant antibodies and their use for food immunoanalysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Converting the guided-modes of Bloch surface waves with surface pattern.Journal of the Optical Society of America. B, Optical physics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sol-Gel Thin Films for Plasmonic Gas Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frances S LiglerNaval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, 455 Overlook Avenue South West, Washington, DC 20375, USA.

Funding

Partnership for Detection of Infection by Category B PathogensU01AI075489 · NIAID · U.S. NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY · PI LIGLER, FRANCES S. · 2007 to 2011
$4.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075489NIAID NIH HHS UO1AI075489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical biosensors have begun to move from the laboratory to the point of use. This trend will be accelerated by new concepts for molecular recognition, integration of microfluidics and optics, simplified fabrication technologies, improved approaches to biosensor system integration, and dramatically increased awareness of the applicability of sensor technology to improve public health and environmental monitoring. Examples of innovations are identified that will lead to smaller, faster, cheaper optical biosensor systems with capacity to provide effective and actionable information.

Indexed as

NanotechnologyOptical DevicesAutomationBiosensing TechniquesMicrofluidicsNanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID19140774
PMCPMC2666073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.