Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1914072›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews1991

Adhesion mechanisms in lymphatic metastasis.

P Brodt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P BrodtDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of cellular adhesion in regional lymph node metastasis of solid tumors has been investigated. The data reviewed is based on studies in four different tumor models of human, rat and murine origin. An in vitro assay measuring tumor cell attachment to cryostat sections of normal peripheral lymph nodes, obtained from the species of tumor origin was used to compare the adhesion of tumor sublines with different metastatic potentials. A good correlation was found between tumor cell potential to metastasize to regional nodes and the adhesion to the sections in all models studied. The adhesion of all tumor lines could be blocked by Arg-Gly-Asp containing peptides while pretreatment of the cells with antibodies to integrins implicated beta 1 and beta 3 receptor complexes in the adhesion. Ligand binding assays provided indirect evidence that the preferential attachment of the metastatic tumor lines to the frozen sections was mediated via extracellular matrix proteins such as fibronectin, vitronectin and type IV collagen. As these basement membrane proteins have been localized to the outer surfaces of reticular fibers which are known to permeate the lymph node and trasverse the subcapsular sinus it is postulated that tumor cell attachment to these fibers may facilitate and possibly be required for tumor cell retention and growth in the invaded regional nodes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbohydratesCell AdhesionHumansIntegrinsLymphatic MetastasisMiceModels, BiologicalRatsCarbohydratesIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID1914072
OpenAlexW2020443338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.