Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19140230›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2009

Effects of ciglitazone and troglitazone on the proliferation of human stomach cancer cells.

Chan Woo Cheon, Dae Hwan Kim, Dong Heon Kim, Yong Hoon Cho, Jae Hun Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mapping the Single-Cell Differentiation Landscape of Osteosarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IFRD1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in a Chinese population.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chan Woo CheonDepartment of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.
Dae Hwan Kim
Dong Heon Kim
Yong Hoon Cho
Jae Hun Kim
Pusan National University · KRTexas A&M University System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the cytological and molecular effects of peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma and PPAR-gamma agonists on stomach cancer cells.

methodsTo determine the proliferation-suppressive effects of troglitazone and ciglitazone, SNU-216 and SNU-668 stomach cancer cells were plated in media containing 40 micromol/L troglitazone and ciglitazone at a density of 1 multiply 10(4) cells/well. After 3, 5 and 7 d, the cells were counted with a hemocytometer. To assess the appearance of PPAR-gamma, a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed. On day 7, Western blotting was used to determine the effects of troglitazone and ciglitazone on the expression of p21 and phosphorylated-ERK (pERK) genes. Flow cytometry analysis was used to determine which portion of the cell cycle was delayed when troglitazone was used to suppress cell proliferation. In order to clarify the mechanism underlying the activity of troglitazone, microarray analysis was conducted.

resultsPPAR-gamma was manifested in both SNU-216 and SNU-668 cells. Ciglitazone and troglitazone suppressed cell growth, and troglitazone was a stronger suppressor of stomach cancer cells than ciglitazone, an inducer of cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase. SNU-668 cells were also determined to be more sensitive to ciglitazone and troglitazone than SNU-216 cells. When troglitazone and ciglitazone were administered to stomach cancer cells, levels of p21 expression were increased, but ERK phosphorylation levels were reduced. When GW9662, an antagonist of PPAR-gamma, was applied in conjunction with ciglitazone and troglitazone, the cell growth suppression effect was unaffected. The gene transcription program revealed a variety of alterations as the consequence of troglitazone treatment, and multiple troglitazone-associated pathways were detected. The genes whose expression was increased by troglitazone treatment were associated with cell development, differentiation, signal transmission between cells, and cell adhesion, and were also associated with reductions in cell proliferation, the cell cycle, nuclear metabolism, and phosphorylation.

conclusionTroglitazone and ciglitazone suppress the proliferation of stomach cancer cells via a PPAR-gamma-independent pathway.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell ShapeChromansCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesGene Expression ProfilingHumansHypoglycemic AgentsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPPAR gammaStomach NeoplasmsThiazolidinedionesTroglitazoneChromansciglitazoneCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesHypoglycemic AgentsPPAR gammaThiazolidinedionesTroglitazone

Identifiers

PMID19140230
PMCPMC2653327
OpenAlexW1983930439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.