Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19140205›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2009

Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays.

Antonella Marangoni, Alessandra Moroni, Silvia Accardo, Roberto Cevenini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Syphilis Laboratory Guidelines: Performance Characteristics of Nontreponemal Antibody Tests.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of different confirmatory algorithms using seven treponemal tests on Architect Syphilis TP-positive/RPR-negative sera.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  10. Syphilis testing in blood donors: an update.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of the Determine Syphilis TP assay for the detection of antibodies against Treponema pallidum for the serodiagnosis of syphilis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  18. Validation of reverse sequence screening for syphilis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonella MarangoniDipartimento di Ematologia e Sc. Oncologiche, Section of Microbiology, St. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. marangoni@aosp.bo.it
Alessandra Moroni
Silvia Accardo
Roberto Cevenini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serological detection of specific antibodies to Treponema pallidum is of particular importance in the diagnosis of syphilis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performances of automated immunoassays in comparison with T. pallidum hemagglutination test (TPHA) and Western Blot (WB). The retrospective study was performed with different panels of sera: 244 clinical and serological characterized syphilitic sera and 203 potentially interfering samples. All the sera were tested by Enzygnost Syphilis, ARCHITECT Syphilis TP, TPHA, and homemade WB. The diagnostic performances of the two assays were very similar: both Enzygnost Syphilis and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP performed with a sensitivity of 99.2%, whereas the specificity was 98.5 and 98.4%, respectively. Considering the suitability for automation, both immunoassays may represent a good choice as a screening test. However, the use of a confirmatory test, such as TPHA or WB, remains a must in order to avoid false-positive results.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialAutomationBlotting, WesternFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHemagglutination TestsHumansImmunoassayImmunoenzyme TechniquesLuminescent MeasurementsMalePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRabbitsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19140205
PMCPMC6649049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.