Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19140165›Full record

ArticleSynapse (New York, N.Y.)2009

Cholinergic direct inhibition of N-methyl-D aspartate receptor-mediated currents in the rat neocortex.

Jorge Flores-Hernandez, Humberto Salgado, Victor De La Rosa, Tania Avila-Ruiz, Oswaldo Torres-Ramirez, Gustavo Lopez-Lopez, Marco Atzori

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synapse (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Roles of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors (NMDARs) in Epilepsy.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  5. Molecular Underpinnings of Estradiol-Mediated Sexual Dimorphism of Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampus of Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Differential Modulation of GABAFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge Flores-HernandezInstituto de Fisiologia, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Humberto Salgado
Victor De La Rosa
Tania Avila-Ruiz
Oswaldo Torres-Ramirez
Gustavo Lopez-Lopez
Marco Atzori
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MXThe University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

Acetylcholine and dopamine modulation in auditory cortexR01DC005986 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI ATZORI, MARCO · 2004 to 2007
$1.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS 5R01DC005986NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh) and N-methyl-D aspartate receptors (NMDARs) interact in the regulation of multiple important brain functions. NMDAR activation is indirectly modulated by ACh through the activation of muscarinic or nicotinic receptors. Scant information is available on whether ACh directly interacts with the NMDAR. By using a cortical brain slice preparation we found that the application of ACh and of other drugs acting on muscarinic or nicotinic receptors induces an acute and reversible reduction of NMDAR-mediated currents (I(NMDA)), ranging from 20 to 90% of the control amplitude. The reduction displayed similar features in synaptic I(NMDA) in brain slices, as well as in currents evoked by NMDA application in brain slices or from acutely dissociated cortical cells, demonstrating its postsynaptic nature. The cholinergic inhibition of I(NMDA) displayed an onset-offset rate in the order of a second, and was resistant to the presence of the muscarinic antagonist atropine (10 microM) in the extracellular solution, and of G-protein blocker GDP(beta)S (500 microM) and activator GTP(gamma)S (400 microM) in the intracellular solution, indicating that it was not G-protein dependent. Recording at depolarized or hyperpolarized holding voltages reduced NMDAR-mediated currents to similar extents, suggesting that the inhibition was voltage-independent, whereas the reduction was markedly more pronounced in the presence of glycine (20 microM). A detailed analysis of the effects of tubocurarine suggested that at least this drug interfered with glycine-dependent NMDAR-activity. We conclude that NMDAR-mediated current scan be inhibited directly by cholinergic drugs, possibly by direct interaction within one or more subunits of the NMDAR. Our results could supply a new interpretation to previous studies on the role of ACh at the glutamatergic synapse.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsAuditory CortexBiophysicsCholinergic AgentsDrug InteractionsElectric StimulationExcitatory Amino Acid AgentsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)In Vitro TechniquesMembrane PotentialsNeural InhibitionNeuronsN-MethylaspartatePatch-Clamp TechniquesAcetylcholineCholinergic AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid AgentsGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)N-MethylaspartateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID19140165
PMCPMC2836798
OpenAlexW2085146864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.