ArticleDer Pathologe2009
[Identification and validation of clinically relevant molecular alterations in prostate cancer].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant cellular alterations required for the development and progression of cancers are detectable at the molecular level and represent potential targets for gene-specific therapies. Modern chip techniques allow the parallel analysis of virtually all known human genes and proteins in a single experiment. Using modern high-throughput techniques, numerous potential new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prediction of prostate cancer have been identified. However, so far none of these markers has improved clinical practice. One of the most important challenges in the coming years is the extensive clinical validation of molecular data using clinically relevant end points. For this venture the pivotal prerequisite is the availability of large, comprehensively annotated and standardized high-quality bioresources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19139898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.