Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19139864›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2009

Excitatory and inhibitory processes in primary motor cortex during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task are unrelated to response expectancy.

Craig Sinclair, Geoffrey R Hammond

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.Experimental brain research · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neural and behavioral mechanisms of proactive and reactive inhibition.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2016
    Review
  12. Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  20. Influence of cueing on the preparation and execution of untrained and trained complex motor responses.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Craig SinclairSchool of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Hackett Drive, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. sinclc01@student.uwa.edu.au
Geoffrey R Hammond

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) is shortened when a warning signal precedes the response signal, a finding attributed to response preparation during the foreperiod between the warning and response signals. In a previous experiment, we delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during the short constant foreperiod of a warned RT task and found simultaneous suppression of motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and reduction of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) on warned trials (Sinclair and Hammond in Exp Brain Res 186:385-392, 2008). To investigate the extent to which these phenomena are associated with response preparation we measured MEP amplitude and SICI during the foreperiod of a warned RT task in which three different warning signals specified the probability (0, 0.5, or 0.83) of response signal presentation. MEP amplitude was suppressed (Experiment 1) and SICI reduced (Experiment 2) equally in all of the warned conditions relative to when TMS was delivered in the inter-trial interval (ITI) suggesting that the modulation of primary motor cortex excitability during the foreperiod does not depend on momentary response expectancy induced by the warning signal. The reduction of SICI and suppression of MEP amplitude can be explained by assuming that a warning signal induces automatic motor cortical activation which is balanced by a competing inhibition to prevent premature response. A composite measure which weighted both speed and accuracy of response was positively correlated with the MEP amplitude during both the foreperiod and the ITI, suggesting that high motor cortical excitability is associated with optimized preparatory strategies for fast and accurate response.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityMotor CortexNeural InhibitionPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.