Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19139763›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2009

Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems.

Darren J Wilkinson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 201 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
201citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

201 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Darren J WilkinsonSchool of Mathematics & Statistics and the Centre for Integrated Systems Biology of Ageing and Nutrition, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE1 7RU, UK. d.j.wilkinson@ncl.ac.uk

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBC0082001Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F023545/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBF0235451Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBSB16550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two related developments are currently changing traditional approaches to computational systems biology modelling. First, stochastic models are being used increasingly in preference to deterministic models to describe biochemical network dynamics at the single-cell level. Second, sophisticated statistical methods and algorithms are being used to fit both deterministic and stochastic models to time course and other experimental data. Both frameworks are needed to adequately describe observed noise, variability and heterogeneity of biological systems over a range of scales of biological organization.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, BiologicalStochastic ProcessesSystems BiologyComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53MDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID19139763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.