Patient reported outcome measures in trials.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2012
   Pooled it
2. Should patients perception of health status be integrated in the prognostic assessment of heart failure patients? A prospective study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
   Trial
3. Acupuncture for depression: exploring model validity and the related issue of credibility in the context of designing a pragmatic trial.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2012
   Trial
4. Heterogeneity of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024
   Review
5. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
   Article
6. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish fear-avoidance components scale and clinical implications in primary care.BMC family practice · 2020
   Article
7. Cancer-related fatigue stratification system based on patient-reported outcomes and objective outcomes: A cancer-related fatigue ambulatory index.PloS one · 2019
   Article
8. Cross-cultural validation of simplified Chinese version of spine functional index.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017
   Article
9. Spanish modified version of the palliative care outcome scale-symptoms renal: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.BMC nephrology · 2016
   Article
10. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAMsp).Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2016
    Observational
11. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish central sensitization inventory.SpringerPlus · 2016
    Article
12. Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how.Patient preference and adherence · 2016
    Review
13. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2015
    Article
14. Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2014
    Observational
15. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2014
    Observational
16. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2013
    Article
17. Patient Characterization Protocols for Psychophysiological Studies of Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-TBI Psychiatric Disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2013
    Article
18. TEFTOM: A Promising General Trauma Expectation/Outcome Measure-Results of a Validation Study on Pan-American Ankle and Distal Tibia Trauma Patients.ISRN orthopedics · 2013
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Patient reported trial outcomes. What about the cost to use the measures?2009
• Comment on
  Health related quality of life after combined hormone replacement therapy: randomised controlled trial.2008
• Comment on
  Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review.2009

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as