Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19138988›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2008

Single nucleotide polymorphism-based genome-wide chromosome copy change, loss of heterozygosity, and aneuploidy in Barrett's esophagus neoplastic progression.

Xiaohong Li, Patricia C Galipeau, Carissa A Sanchez, Patricia L Blount, Carlo C Maley, Jessica Arnaudo, Daniel A Peiffer, Dmitry Pokholok, Kevin L Gunderson, Brian J Reid

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Review
  2. Molecular characterization of Barrett's esophagus at single-cell resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Surgical pathology clinics · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A biomarker panel predicts progression of Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Whole slide image cytometry: a novel method to detect abnormal DNA content in Barrett's esophagus.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers of Barrett's esophagus.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Predictive biomarkers for Barrett's esophagus: so near and yet so far.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohong LiDivisions of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. xili@fhcrc.org
Patricia C Galipeau
Carissa A Sanchez
Patricia L Blount
Carlo C Maley
Jessica Arnaudo
Daniel A Peiffer
Dmitry Pokholok
Kevin L Gunderson
Brian J Reid
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USIllumina (United States) · US

Funding

PHYLOGENIES of Barrett's Esophagus LineagesP01CA091955 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2002 to 2019
$35.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091955NCI NIH HHS P01CA91955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome copy gain, loss, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) involving most chromosomes have been reported in many cancers; however, less is known about chromosome instability in premalignant conditions. 17p LOH and DNA content abnormalities have been previously reported to predict progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). Here, we evaluated genome-wide chromosomal instability in multiple stages of BE and EA in whole biopsies. Forty-two patients were selected to represent different stages of progression from BE to EA. Whole BE or EA biopsies were minced, and aliquots were processed for flow cytometry and genotyped with a paired constitutive control for each patient using 33,423 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). Copy gains, losses, and LOH increased in frequency and size between early- and late-stage BE (P < 0.001), with SNP abnormalities increasing from <2% to >30% in early and late stages, respectively. A set of statistically significant events was unique to either early or late, or both, stages, including previously reported and novel abnormalities. The total number of SNP alterations was highly correlated with DNA content aneuploidy and was sensitive and specific to identify patients with concurrent EA (empirical receiver operating characteristic area under the curve = 0.91). With the exception of 9p LOH, most copy gains, losses, and LOH detected in early stages of BE were smaller than those detected in later stages, and few chromosomal events were common in all stages of progression. Measures of chromosomal instability can be quantified in whole biopsies using SNP-based genotyping and have potential to be an integrated platform for cancer risk stratification in BE.

Indexed as

AneuploidyGene DosageLoss of HeterozygosityAdenocarcinomaAgedBarrett EsophagusChromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyHumans

Identifiers

PMID19138988
PMCPMC2882787
OpenAlexW2134537028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.