Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19138934›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2008

Oral epithelium as a surrogate tissue for assessing smoking-induced molecular alterations in the lungs.

Manisha Bhutani, Ashutosh Kumar Pathak, You-Hong Fan, Diane D Liu, J Jack Lee, Hongli Tang, Jonathan M Kurie, Rodolfo C Morice, Edward S Kim, Waun Ki Hong and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Gene expression profiling predicts the development of oral cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2011
    Trial
  4. Epigenomic Dysregulation in Youth Vapers: Implications for Disease Risk Assessment.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Short-term exposure to PMRespiratory research · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Oral premalignancy: the roles of early detection and chemoprevention.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Manisha BhutaniDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
Ashutosh Kumar Pathak
You-Hong Fan
Diane D Liu
J Jack Lee
Hongli Tang
Jonathan M Kurie
Rodolfo C Morice
Edward S Kim
Waun Ki Hong
Li Mao

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRIAL OF CELECOXIB IN LUNG CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIONP01CA091844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HONG, WAUN KI · 2001 to 2005
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA091844NCI NIH HHS CA-16672NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091844NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lungs and oral cavity of smokers are exposed to tobacco carcinogens. We hypothesized that tobacco-induced molecular alterations in the oral epithelium are similar to those in the lungs, and thus the oral epithelium may be used as a surrogate tissue for assessing alterations in the lungs. We used methylation-specific PCR to analyze promoter methylation of the p16 and FHIT genes at baseline and 3 months after intervention in 1,774 oral and bronchial brush specimens from 127 smokers enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled chemoprevention trial. The association between methylation patterns in oral tissues and bronchial methylation indices (methylated sites / total sites per subject) was analyzed in a blinded fashion. At baseline, promoter methylation in bronchial tissue was present in 23% of samples for p16, 17% for FHIT, and 35% for p16 and FHIT; these percentages were comparable to methylation in oral tissue: 19% (p16), 15% (FHIT), and 31% (p16 and FHIT). Data from both oral and bronchial tissues were available for 125 individuals, in whom the two sites correlated strongly with respect to alterations (P < 0.0001 for both p16 and FHIT). At baseline, the mean bronchial methylation index was far higher in patients with oral tissue methylation (in either of the two genes; 39 patients) than in patients without oral tissue methylation (86 patients): 0.53 +/- 0.29 versus 0.27 + 0.26 methylation index (P < 0.0001). Similar correlations occurred at 3 months after intervention. Our results support the potential of oral epithelium as a surrogate tissue for assessing tobacco-induced molecular damage in the lungs and thus have important implications for designing future lung cancer prevention trials and for research into the risk and early detection of lung cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAcid Anhydride HydrolasesAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBis(5'-adenosyl)triphosphataseDNA MethylationFemaleGenes, p16HumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMouth MucosaAcid Anhydride HydrolasesBiomarkersBis(5'-adenosyl)triphosphataseNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19138934
PMCPMC4183362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.