Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19137409›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2009

A comparison of sodium bicarbonate infusion versus normal saline infusion and its combination with oral acetazolamide for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Maryam Pakfetrat, Mohammad Hossein Nikoo, Leila Malekmakan, Mahmood Tabandeh, Jamshid Roozbeh, Mahshid Hashemi Nasab, Mohammad Ali Ostovan, Soheila Salari, Mohammad Kafi, Najmeh Moin Vaziri and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diuretics for preventing and treating acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Acute kidney injury.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. The role of acetazolamide in critical care and emergency medicine.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam PakfetratShiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein Nikoo
Leila Malekmakan
Mahmood Tabandeh
Jamshid Roozbeh
Mahshid Hashemi Nasab
Mohammad Ali Ostovan
Soheila Salari
Mohammad Kafi
Najmeh Moin Vaziri
Farzad Adl
Mehdi Hosseini
Parviz Khajehdehi
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRKowsar Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is commonly encountered. Because the therapy of choice for prevention of CIN is controversial, in this study we compared the preventive efficacy of bicarbonate (Bi) infusion in dextrose water versus normal saline (NLS) infusion alone or in combination with oral acetazolamide (AZ).

methodsIn a double-blind and randomized clinical trial, all patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention received NLS (NLS group), its combination with AZ (AZ group) or infusion of Bi (Bi group) before the procedures. RIFLE (risk of renal failure, injury to the kidney, failure of kidney function, loss of kidney function, and end-stage renal disease) criteria were used to define CIN-associated acute kidney injury (AKI).

resultsThe risk of AKI in CIN was significantly lower in the Bi and AZ groups than in the NLS group (P <or= 0.04). Comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment values in each group the following results were obtained: serum creatinine (Scr) increased and eGFR decreased significantly in the NLS group (P = 0.04) and in all patients (P = 0.001, P = 0.02, respectively). In addition, serum potassium decreased significantly in the Bi and NLS groups (P <or= 0.02). Also, serum Bi increased significantly in the Bi group (P = 0.001) whereas it decreased significantly in the AZ group (P = 0.001). Urinary pH also increased in all groups (P <or= 0.04) except the NLS group (P > 0.05).

conclusionsIt seems that both Bi and AZ reduce the risk of CIN-related AKI, and close monitoring of serum potassium is needed during bicarbonate infusion.

Indexed as

AcetazolamideAdministration, OralCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsContrast MediaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedSodium BicarbonateSodium ChlorideAcetazolamideCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsContrast MediaSodium BicarbonateSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID19137409
OpenAlexW2023795969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.