Nomenclature discrepancies in the HPRTB short tandem repeat.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Twenty Years Later: A Comprehensive Review of the X Chromosome Use in Forensic Genetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2020
   Review
2. Brazilian genetic database of chromosome X.Molecular biology reports · 2014
   Article
3. Allele and haplotype diversity of X-chromosomal STRs in Ivory Coast.International journal of legal medicine · 2011
   Article
4. Allele frequencies of 11 X-chromosomal loci of two population samples from Africa.International journal of legal medicine · 2011
   Article
5. Development of the nine X-STR loci typing system and genetic analysis in three nationality populations from China.International journal of legal medicine · 2011
   Article
6. Sixteen X-chromosomal STRs in two octaplex PCRs in Japanese population and development of 15-locus multiplex PCR system.International journal of legal medicine · 2010
   Article
7. Genetic variation of 10 X chromosomal STR loci in Indian population.International journal of legal medicine · 2010
   Article
8. Evaluation of DXS9902, DXS7132, DXS6809, DXS7133, and DXS7423 in humans and chimpanzees: sequence variation, repeat structure, and nomenclature.International journal of legal medicine · 2009
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as